Question 37a

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29577

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

low-level car parking facilities

Full text:

low-level car parking facilities

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29699

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Brookgate object to the current proposed surface car parking layout. The consented layout doesn't make best use of the site. It would be difficult to extend or to construct a multi-storey structure on the footprint given the site's shape and proximity to the Bramblefields reserve.
Better location for a surface car park is adjacent to the existing main railway line, north ofnew station building. A conventional rectangular footprint could be used, being more efficient in terms of the number of spaces and providing flexibility to convert to a multi-storey car park if sufficient future demand arises.

Full text:

Brookgate object to the current proposed surface car parking layout. The consented layout doesn't make best use of the site. It would be difficult to extend or to construct a multi-storey structure on the footprint given the site's shape and proximity to the Bramblefields reserve.
Better location for a surface car park is adjacent to the existing main railway line, north ofnew station building. A conventional rectangular footprint could be used, being more efficient in terms of the number of spaces and providing flexibility to convert to a multi-storey car park if sufficient future demand arises.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29931

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

The County Council would wish to consider the form of car parking provision at a later date when further details are known. It is important to note, however, that car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and careful consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport access to the site, and thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe

Full text:

The County Council would wish to consider the form of car parking provision at a later date when further details are known. It is important to note, however, that car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and careful consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport access to the site, and thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30051

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

Seems short-sighted. Justification for capacity not provided.

Full text:

Seems short-sighted. Justification for capacity not provided.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30196

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30226

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Urban&Civic Ltd

Agent: David Lock Associates

Representation Summary:

Object. The CNFE Area should be looking to maximise developable land in and around the comprehensive transport networks that exist.

Full text:

Object. The CNFE Area should be looking to maximise developable land in and around the comprehensive transport networks that exist.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30344

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

I support Otion B.

Full text:

I support Otion B.