Question 23b

Showing comments and forms 1 to 14 of 14

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29276

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

Let's integrate with the wider ecoconmic area.

Full text:

Let's integrate with the wider ecoconmic area.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29332

Received: 16/12/2014

Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell

Representation Summary:

Appropriate in the wider context.

Full text:

Appropriate in the wider context.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29404

Received: 09/01/2015

Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney

Representation Summary:

The whole area should have similar policies.

Full text:

The whole area should have similar policies.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29515

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Hazel Smith

Representation Summary:

CSP is to be redeveloped and the whole area should be considered together. The environment of CSP's early phases with its now-mature trees should be treated carefully, so as not to lose the 'Park' concept.

Full text:

CSP is to be redeveloped and the whole area should be considered together. The environment of CSP's early phases with its now-mature trees should be treated carefully, so as not to lose the 'Park' concept.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29560

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

Yes

Full text:

Yes

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29668

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Proposed Submission South Cambridgeshire Local Plan Policy E/1 provides sufficient support for employment development and redevelopment to enable the continued expansion and intensification of high technology R & D clusters in the Science Park. There is no requirement for further policy guidance which would risk complicating proceedings for developers, potentially hindering the continued successful development of the Science Park.

Full text:

Proposed Submission South Cambridgeshire Local Plan Policy E/1 provides sufficient support for employment development and redevelopment to enable the continued expansion and intensification of high technology R & D clusters in the Science Park. There is no requirement for further policy guidance which would risk complicating proceedings for developers, potentially hindering the continued successful development of the Science Park.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29775

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

The intensification/densification of sites within the Cambridge Science Park should be judged against existing and emerging Local Plan policies and other material such as NPPF. The intensification of uses within the science park is a current and ongoing dynamic and the need to provide guidance is now. To delay providing guidance by placing it within this AAP would be too late. The Council should seek to address these issues through the Draft Local Plan which could be complemented by Supplementary Planning Guidance which could be relatively quick to produce, if it is considered necessary at all.

Full text:

The intensification/densification of sites within the Cambridge Science Park should be judged against existing and emerging Local Plan policies and other material such as NPPF. The intensification of uses within the science park is a current and ongoing dynamic and the need to provide guidance is now. To delay providing guidance by placing it within this AAP would be too late. The Council should seek to address these issues through the Draft Local Plan which could be complemented by Supplementary Planning Guidance which could be relatively quick to produce, if it is considered necessary at all.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29810

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: Trinity College, Cambridge

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

The Cambridge Science Park (CSP) is an existing entity and is very different to a regeneration development. The bespoke policies being derived for the CNFE area through site-specific studies should not, and cannot, be so readily applied to CSP.
Trinity College (as owners and custodians of the CSP) is supportive of CNFE but there is no need, nor is it appropriate, to apply policies that are emerging as bespoke for CNFE as blanket policies to a wider area.

Full text:

The Cambridge Science Park (CSP) is an existing entity and is very different to a regeneration development. The bespoke policies being derived for the CNFE area through site-specific studies should not, and cannot, be so readily applied to CSP.
Trinity College (as owners and custodians of the CSP) is supportive of CNFE but there is no need, nor is it appropriate, to apply policies that are emerging as bespoke for CNFE as blanket policies to a wider area.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29895

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Support in order to protect the Cambridge Science Park from possible conversions and retain its essential character and attractiveness.

Full text:

Support in order to protect the Cambridge Science Park from possible conversions and retain its essential character and attractiveness.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30026

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

Provides level playing field across both sites.

Full text:

Provides level playing field across both sites.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30157

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30318

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

The plan should not interfere with something that is already very successful.

Full text:

The plan should not interfere with something that is already very successful.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30396

Received: 04/02/2015

Respondent: Milton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

CSP is to be redeveloped and the whole area should be considered together. The environment of CSP's early phases with its now-mature trees should be treated carefully, so as not to lose the 'Park' concept.

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30653

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

As set out above we support the inclusion of the Science Park within the AAP area. However, the issues related to the Science Park are not unique and there is no requirement for additional policy guidance for Cambridge Science Park. Site specific policies may be required to control the type and quality of development on opportunity sites within the AAP area.

Full text:

See attached document