Figure 98
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 30865
Received: 06/03/2016
Respondent: Chris Smith
We object to the inclusion of this and the subsequent diagram, since the densities within it are quite clearly calculated inconsistently. Some include POS; some don't. Some reach to the mid-line of the access routes; some don't. The basis of the calculations and boundaries needs to be indicated as well as definition of "density". We request that "net maximum density" is the definition used as the most transparent.
We object to the inclusion of this and the subsequent diagram, since the densities within it are quite clearly calculated inconsistently. Some include POS; some don't. Some reach to the mid-line of the access routes; some don't. The basis of the calculations and boundaries needs to be indicated as well as definition of "density". We request that "net maximum density" is the definition used as the most transparent.