3.2.4

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Grafton Area of Major Change SPD 2017

Representation ID: 31996

Received: 04/11/2017

Respondent: Mr John Coyle

Representation Summary:

The Greater Cambridgeshire Partnership are not competent to comment on this proposal.
They are clearly led by the Cycling Lobby. Pedestrians first should be the priority. Private policing is a must to rid the City of this huge lawless highway user.l

Full text:

The Greater Cambridgeshire Partnership are not competent to comment on this proposal.
They are clearly led by the Cycling Lobby. Pedestrians first should be the priority. Private policing is a must to rid the City of this huge lawless highway user.l

Support

Grafton Area of Major Change SPD 2017

Representation ID: 32070

Received: 06/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Martin Lucas-Smith

Representation Summary:

There are many schemes where the Greater Cambridge Partnership are failing to cater for cycling properly, and there have been active campaigns by cyclists against various GCP proposals. Greater Cambridge Partnership remains far too focussed on catering for motor traffic rather than seeking major change.

Full text:

There are many schemes where the Greater Cambridge Partnership are failing to cater for cycling properly, and there have been active campaigns by cyclists against various GCP proposals. Greater Cambridge Partnership remains far too focussed on catering for motor traffic rather than seeking major change.