We are unclear as to what benefits this SPD will bring. It is the design of development which impacts peoples health i.e. how people's travel, whether homes have single or dual aspects, access to greenspace etc. All these requirements should be set out in the policies in the next Local Plan.

The delivery of health impacts will be dependant upon the quality of the development. The SPD needs to stress that this is not a tick box exercise but aim to delivery high quality development.

The SPD needs to set out how conflicts between themes are resolved such as requiring well lit routes but these may impact wildlife.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for consulting us on the abovementioned document.

As you may be aware National Highways (formerly Highways England) is a strategic highway company under the provisions of the infrastructure Act 2015 and is the highway authority, traffic authority and street authority for the Strategic Road Network (SRN). As such we have responsibilities for managing the SRN in accordance of our licence and in general conformity with the requirements of the Highways Act 1980 and to satisfy the reasonable requirements of road safety.

It is noted that once adopted, this SPD will become a material consideration in the determining of planning applications. Where relevant, National Highways will be a statutory consultee on future planning applications within the area and will assess the impact on the SRN of a planning application accordingly.

Notwithstanding the above comments, we have reviewed the document and note that the details set out within the document are unlikely to have an severe impact on the operation of the trunk road and we offer No Comment.

Kind regards,

Philip Porter

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please see the attached documents for Natural England’s response.

Yours faithfully,

Dominic Rogers
Consultations Team
Natural England

Dear Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Policy Team

Please see attached Historic England’s response to the Health Impact Assessment SPD.

Please confirm receipt of our response.

Should you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours sincerely

Debbie Mack

On behalf our client Vistry Strategic Land, please find attached our representations to the current HIA SPD consultation.

We would be grateful for confirmation of safe receipt.

Kind regards

Donna

Donna Brearley
Associate Director

Dear Sirs

Please find attached Fowlmere Parish Council's Responses to:

1. Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document
2. Draft Greater Cambridge Health Impact Assessment Supplementary Planning Document

3. Draft Cambridge Biomedical Campus Supplementary Planning Document

Kind Regards

Angela

Angela Mulholland
Fowlmere Parish Clerk & RFO

Dear Lizzie,

Please find attached a response from the University of Cambridge to the Health Impact Assessment SPD consultation.

Best wishes,

Paul
Paul Milliner MRTPI I Head of Planning

Thank you for consulting Central Bedfordshire Council (CBC) on the following Supplementary Planning Documents:
• Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations SPD
• Draft Greater Cambridge Health Impact Assessment SPD
• Draft Cambridge Biomedical Campus SPD

CBC welcome the opportunity to comment on the SPDs and we hope you find our comments relating to the Planning Obligations SPD useful. We do not have any specific comments to make in relation to the Draft Health Impact Assessment SPD and Draft Cambridge Biomedical Campus SPD. Please accept this letter as our formal response.

Kind Regards

Local Plans Team