Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Health Impact Assessment Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 200347
Received: 27/01/2025
Respondent: Vistry Group
Agent: Turley Economics
We would affirm that positive engagement in the HIA consultation process on the behalf of the relevant LPA officers is required to ensure that the HIA process is conducted efficiently. We would therefore request for LPA commitment to engage positively with applicants upon being consulted on HIA matters, and for officers to be informed about HIA requirements and processes so as to provide effective and efficient advice.
On behalf our client Vistry Strategic Land, please find attached our representations to the current HIA SPD consultation.
We would be grateful for confirmation of safe receipt.
Kind regards
Donna
Donna Brearley
Associate Director
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Health Impact Assessment Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 200569
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Carter Jonas
Number of people: 6
It is also incumbent on the Local Authorities to ensure that there is adequate existing provision for existing and future residents. It has to be recognised that an individual site or development cannot address
wider health impacts that are already ‘at large’ in the immediate or wider population so interventions need to be appropriate, proportional and viable. Any enhanced provision must meet the tests in Regulation 122 and planning obligations should only be sought where they meet the legal tests.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Here are some representations in respect of the above reference consultation draft SPD’s submitted on behalf of the following named clients:
• TLC Group
• Rockley Dene Homes Ltd
• The Fellows House Ltd
• SPK Residential Cambridge Ltd
• London Inn Hotels (Cambridge) Ltd
Yours faithfully
Colin Brown
Colin Brown MRTPI
Partner, Head of Planning & Development