Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200290
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Savills UK
Please see attached document for representations on behalf of Pigeon.
Please see attached document for representations on behalf of Pigeon.
Object
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200294
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Abbey Properties Cambridgeshire Limited
The contributions should apply to major housing developments only. The scale of the contributions for minor housing developments will be significant and is likely to deter development from taking place. The scale of the contributions would severely impact the viability of new developments and, for those schemes that do proceed, would be likely to increase the sale or rental costs.
The contributions should apply to major housing developments only. The scale of the contributions for minor housing developments will be significant and is likely to deter development from taking place. The scale of the contributions would severely impact the viability of new developments and, for those schemes that do proceed, would be likely to increase the sale or rental costs.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200319
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Home Builders Federation
This SPD suggests that obligations will be sought from residential developments, it sets out the costs by dwelling size including capital costs and maintenance costs, these are slightly different for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire.
The home building industry are used to providing public open space as part of development or as contributions where appropriate. However, it will be important to ensure that these requirements are viable and deliverable and do not prevent or stall delivery of homes.
This section of the SPD is based on Policy 68 of the Cambridge Local Plan and Policy SC/7 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan and the Open Space in New Developments SPD. This SPD suggests that obligations will be sought from residential developments, it sets out the costs by dwelling size including capital costs and maintenance costs, these are slightly different for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire.
The home building industry are used to providing public open space as part of development or as contributions where appropriate. However, it will be important to ensure that these requirements are viable and deliverable and do not prevent or stall delivery of homes.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200343
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Sport England
Paragraph 14.16 of the SPD outlines that the provision of on-site outdoor playing pitches should be made with regard to the most recently adopted Greater Cambridge Playing Pitch Strategy. . Consequently, the SPD would fail to accord with paragraph 103 of the NPPF because the SPD would not be ‘based on robust and up-to-date assessment of the need for… sport… and opportunities for new provision.
Sport England suggests that text should be incorporated under the subheading for outdoor sports, similar to the guidance provided for indoor sports in paragraph 15.10, informing applicants that an updated Playing Pitch Strategy is set to be adopted in due course.
In terms of on-site provision, an estimate of the demand generated for outdoor sports provision can be provided by Sport England’s Playing Pitch Calculator strategic planning tool. Sport England therefore recommends text is included under the subheading outdoor sports facilities, advising that a Playing Pitch Strategy is due to be adopted, and the data within those documents should be inputted into Sport England’s calculators to determine onsite/offsite contributions. In addition, Sport England calculate facility costs quarterly using estimates of what it typically costs to build sport facilities, (https://www.sportengland.org/guidance-and-support/facilities-and-planning/design-and-cost-guidance/facility-cost-guidance)
In terms of off-site provision, it is unclear how the capital costs in the SPD have been calculated. A footnote, or explanation, should be provided to ensure it is transparent and clear how these calculations have been equated. Sport England recommends our Playing Pitch Calculator is used to calculate costs based on an updated Playing Pitch Strategy.
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document
Thank you for consulting Sport England on the above.
As I am sure you are aware, Sport England has an established role within the planning system which includes providing advice and guidance on all relevant areas of National and Local Planning Policy as well as supporting Local Authorities in developing their evidence base for sport facilities.
Sport England aims to ensure positive planning for sport and creating opportunities for physical activity by enabling the right facilities to be provided in the right places based on robust and up-to-date assessments of need and strategies for all levels of sport and for all sectors of the community. To achieve this aim our planning objectives are to PROTECT sports facilities from loss as a result of redevelopment, ENHANCE existing facilities through improving their quality, accessibility and management and to PROVIDE new facilities that are fit for purpose and meet demands for sport participation and physical activity now and into the future. You will also be aware that Sport England is a statutory consultee on planning applications affecting playing fields. Further detail on Sport England’s role and objectives within the planning system can be found at https://www.sportengland.org/guidance-and-support/facilities-and-planning/planning-sport
Sport England has considered the Draft Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) in light of these planning objectives and Sport England have the following comments:
Chapter 14: Public Open Space
Outdoor sports facilities are sought based on a standards approach of which Sport England are not supportive of. Reason being is this approach does not reflect the nuances of playing pitch/field provision, for example it does not explain what playing pitch provision should be provided, it could result in playing pitches/fields too small meet the needed playing pitch provision to mitigate the impact of the development and could have implications for maintenance costs. Sport England however recognises that a standards approach was adopted as part of the Cambridge Local Plan and the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan. The open space and recreation standards set out within the SPD are reflective of those within the Cambridge Local Plan and South Cambridgeshire Local Plan.
In terms of on-site provision, paragraph 14.16 of the SPD outlines that the provision of on-site outdoor playing pitches should be made with regard to the most recently adopted Greater Cambridge Playing Pitch Strategy. The existing Playing Pitch Strategy, adopted in 2016 and updated in 2019, is now considerably outdated. Consequently, the SPD would fail to accord with paragraph 103 of the NPPF because the SPD would not be ‘based on robust and up-to-date assessment of the need for… sport… and opportunities for new provision. Information gained from the assessments should be used to determine what open space, sport and recreational provision is needed, which plans should then seek to accommodate.’ Should an applicant dispute the data in the adopted Playing Pitch Strategy, such figures would be deemed outdated. Sport England suggests that text should be incorporated under the subheading for outdoor sports, similar to the guidance provided for indoor sports in paragraph 15.10, informing applicants that an updated Playing Pitch Strategy is set to be adopted in due course.
Sport England has tools that could assist the Council in determining an appropriate level of contribution based on the needs generated from a development. An estimate of the demand generated for outdoor sports provision can be provided by Sport England’s Playing Pitch Calculator strategic planning tool. Team data from the Council’s sport facility strategy can be applied to the Playing Pitch Calculator which can then assess the demand generated in pitch equivalents (and the associated costs of delivery) by the population generated in a new residential development. It can also calculate changing room demand to support the use of this pitch demand. Sport England therefore recommends text is included under the subheading outdoor sports facilities, advising that a Playing Pitch Strategy is due to be adopted, and the data within those documents should be inputted into Sport England’s calculators to determine onsite/offsite contributions. In doing so, this would ensure the contributions sought are based on robust and up-to-date assessments in accordance with Paragraph 103 of the NPPF. In addition, Sport England calculate facility costs quarterly using estimates of what it typically costs to build sport facilities, including fees and external work. This can be found at https://www.sportengland.org/guidance-and-support/facilities-and-planning/design-and-cost-guidance/facility-cost-guidance
In terms of off-site provision, it is unclear how the capital costs in the SPD have been calculated. A footnote, or explanation, should be provided to ensure it is transparent and clear how these calculations have been equated. Notwithstanding this, as advised above, Sport England recommends our Playing Pitch Calculator is used to calculate costs based on an updated Playing Pitch Strategy.
Chapter 15: Indoor Sports, including Swimming
Indoor sports facilities are sought based on a standards approach of which Sport England are not supportive of for the reasons explained above for indoor sports. Sport England recognises that a standards approach was adopted as part of the Cambridge Local Plan and the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan. The standards set out within the SPD are reflective of those within the Cambridge Local Plan and South Cambridgeshire Local Plan.
Sport England welcomes the inclusion of paragraph 15.10, which advises an update of the study is being undertaken. Sport England advises that the following text, highlighted in red below, should be added as a caveat following paragraph 15.15.
‘The costs of contributions are guided by the Sport England Facilities Calculator and may be subject to change’.
Sport England Final Comments
Sport England advises that the draft Playing Pitch Strategy and Built Facility Strategy should be completed and formally adopted, ideally before the publication of the SPD. This approach will ensure that the costs detailed in the SPD are founded on a robust and up to date evidence base for indoor and outdoor sports. Subsequently, the strategies would inform set out the necessary extent of playing pitches and other sports facilities required to address demand.
Sport England trusts the above is of assistance. If you have any questions or would like any further advice, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind Regards,
Clare Howe
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200353
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Jaynic
Jaynic are of the opinion that the SPD is not explicit enough when stating that it is only informal open
space being sought on commercial development. Commercial does not feature as an exemption in the
relevant categories. In addition, there are no quantified tables showing the amount of contribution
required for a commercial developer. Furthermore, the range of developments which fall under the
category of commercial are vast and therefore, whilst informal open space on a city centre scheme
under class E might be suitable, an industrial estate might be less suitable. In these less suitable
developments, open space should be focussed more on the sustainable green linkages which provide
access to services and facilities for the employees of the occupiers.
Please find attached our representations regarding the Planning Obligations SPD Consultation which ends at 5pm today.
You will see from our comments that we have raised a number of matters pertaining particularly to commercial development and would be more than happy to assist the Planning Policy Team going forward if required.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200362
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land and Major Projects
Agent: Turley
It is acknowledged that both Local Plans set out requirements for either the provision of on-site public open space, or an equivalent off-site contribution. It is also noted that the SPD does provide a detailed breakdown of costs and different costs per authority have been set out. However, the capital costs set out need to be evidenced and viability tested by the authorities.
On behalf our client Vistry Strategic Land, please find attached our representations to the current Planning Obligations SPD consultation.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200372
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: University of Cambridge
Whilst paragraph 14.41 is helpful in establishing the principle that some types of home have
different child yields/population profiles, we consider the text should go further to include a
general principle that provision for children in particular can be adjusted if the specialist nature
of the housing indicates a significantly lower child yield per bedroom is likely.
Please find attached a response from the University of Cambridge to the Planning Obligations SPD consultation.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200402
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: U+I (Cambridge) Limited and Cambridge 4 LLP
Agent: Carter Jonas
Paragraph 14.14 states that the Cambridge Local Plan requires 1.2 hectares per 1,000 people of playing pitches, courts and greens. Appendix I states that this is an amalgamation of standards for different sports, based on team generation rates and current provision, and provides guidance regarding how this should be addressed. It is recommend that wording is inserted to clarify that greater flexibility should be given to significant large previously developed sites in the urban context that are subject to the Area Action Plan.
On behalf of our client, U+I (Cambridge) Limited and Cambridge 4 LLP, please find attached our formal Representations to the Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200445
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Mr Howard Felstead
Regarding Paragraph 14.27 a requirement to transfer land to a particular public body like the Parish Council is likely to contravene Regulation 122. There are generally many different options available to secure the proper long-term management and maintenance of open space or other facilities. The Parish Council or Town Council etc have a part to play but a rigid policy of insisting that a Parish Council or Town Council be the first resort as management body is unlikely to be necessary to make a proposed development acceptable in planning terms. This ‘strong advice’ should be removed.
Please see attached comments on the draft SPD.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200455
Received: 28/01/2025
Respondent: Urban & Civic
Agent: David Lock Associates
The SPD should also set out a clear process on how development proposals which are unable to provide on-site nature/wildlife mitigation can provide meaningful off-site mitigation in line with the vision for the forthcoming Local Nature Recovery Strategy.
We would like to take this opportunity to encourage GCSP to support Natural Cambridgeshire, the County Council, and the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority in progressing forthcoming Local Nature Recovery Strategy.
Attached is the representations submitted on behalf of our client Urban&Civic, in response to the Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200463
Received: 23/01/2025
Respondent: Hill Residential Ltd (Hill)
Agent: Tor & Co
It would be useful to include an explanation of the different ‘capital costs’ (cost per m2) of open space land uses in the two areas as it surprising that the capital cost per m2 is so different between them. It is also noted that the ‘capital costs’ section of the SPD does not include the land value, and this is considered separately. This is a different approach from the adopted South Cambridgeshire Open Space SPD where the capital payments of off-site contributions appear to include the land value in the ‘per person’ cost.
On behalf of Hill Residential Ltd (Hill), we have set out in the attached letter a response to the following draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations SPD.