Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200297
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Savills UK
Please see attached document for representations on behalf of Pigeon.
Please see attached document for representations on behalf of Pigeon.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200303
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Abbey Properties Cambridgeshire Limited
Whilst the principle of this approach may seem sensible care needs to be taken as to not dis-incentivise business from progressing beyond the affordable space that they occupy. Clear guidelines and thresholds would need to be established.
Whilst the principle of this approach may seem sensible care needs to be taken as to not dis-incentivise business from progressing beyond the affordable space that they occupy. Clear guidelines and thresholds would need to be established.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200356
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Jaynic
Jaynic appreciates that the new Local Plan provides an opportunity for a policy on affordable workspace
to be inserted. However, at present there are no policies within the adopted Local Plan and with the
emerging Local Plan only commencing works this Autumn/Winter 2025, we are of the opinion that this
should be something that is examined through the Local Plan process with an appointed Inspector, as
the threshold of affordable housing would be. Whilst Jaynic would not be averse to providing a certain
amount of affordable workspace on commercial development in South Cambridgeshire, further clarity
is required to understand the how this will be practically carried out, for example through S106
Please find attached our representations regarding the Planning Obligations SPD Consultation which ends at 5pm today.
You will see from our comments that we have raised a number of matters pertaining particularly to commercial development and would be more than happy to assist the Planning Policy Team going forward if required.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200381
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: University of Cambridge
We do not consider that affordable workspace requirements, which will
have financial implications for schemes (in some cases significant), can be introduced through
an SPD. This is introducing a new policy which SPDs cannot do as set out in National Planning
Practice Guidance (Paragraph: 008 Reference ID: 61-008-20190315)
On a large scale employment development, 10% of space could equate to millions of pounds
worth of opportunity cost, with significant impacts on development deliverability.
This section of the SPD should be removed and if an affordable workspace policy is pursued,
it should be done so through the emerging Greater Cambridge Local Plan where its impact on
development viability can be evidenced.
Please find attached a response from the University of Cambridge to the Planning Obligations SPD consultation.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200408
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: U+I (Cambridge) Limited and Cambridge 4 LLP
Agent: Carter Jonas
Paragraph 20.11 states “the provision of an element of affordable employment space will be most suited to large commercial schemes, and as a minimum over 10,000m2, in use classes E(g), B2 and B8. In London typical agreements have secured 10% of space within qualifying schemes.”
A comparison to London is provided but London is a different market place with different rent levels, supply and demand. There does not appear to be a local policy basis to ask for a contribution in relation to affordable workspace and therefore U+I (Cambridge) Limited and Cambridge 4 LLP question if the planning obligation meets the Regulation 122 tests.
On behalf of our client, U+I (Cambridge) Limited and Cambridge 4 LLP, please find attached our formal Representations to the Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200454
Received: 28/01/2025
Respondent: Urban & Civic
Agent: David Lock Associates
The aspirations behind affordable workspace are laudable, and at Waterbeach Barracks we have been involved in activating meanwhile-community-uses in existing buildings at early stages of development to meet local demand. It should be recognised however that delivering this with ongoing subsidy within new built commercial spaces will be a challenging obligation for many developers, as well as creating onerous management approaches which may lead to additional costs for developers. These aspects will need to be considered as part of the viability process to ensure the obligation is proportionate and sustainable.
Attached is the representations submitted on behalf of our client Urban&Civic, in response to the Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Representation ID: 200580
Received: 24/01/2025
Respondent: Carter Jonas
Number of people: 6
Regarding Paragraph 20.11, It is not clear what is being asked for here. A comparison to London is provided but London is a different marketplace with different rent levels, supply and demand. There does not appear to be a
local policy basis to ask for a contribution in relation to affordable workspace and therefore it is questioned whether the planning obligation meets the Regulation 122 tests.
Dear Sir / Madam,
Here are some representations in respect of the above reference consultation draft SPD’s submitted on behalf of the following named clients:
• TLC Group
• Rockley Dene Homes Ltd
• The Fellows House Ltd
• SPK Residential Cambridge Ltd
• London Inn Hotels (Cambridge) Ltd
Yours faithfully
Colin Brown
Colin Brown MRTPI
Partner, Head of Planning & Development