3.3 Planning Conditions

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Draft Planning Obligations SPD

Representation ID: 28510

Received: 11/07/2014

Respondent: Savills

Agent: Savills

Representation Summary:

Savills welcome the condition first strategy, but request that this goes further to ensure that where conditions are imposed that they are adequately considered and worded such that they do not adversely impact upon the timeframes and costs of development. (e.g. by using a significant number of "prior to commencement" conditions).

Full text:

Savills welcome the condition first strategy, but request that this goes further to ensure that where conditions are imposed that they are adequately considered and worded such that they do not adversely impact upon the timeframes and costs of development. (e.g. by using a significant number of "prior to commencement" conditions).

Support

Draft Planning Obligations SPD

Representation ID: 28552

Received: 14/07/2014

Respondent: Carter Jonas

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

I support the comment at paragraph 3.3.3 that planning conditions are to be preferred to Section 106 Agreements.

Full text:

I support the comment at paragraph 3.3.3 that planning conditions are to be preferred to Section 106 Agreements.