Question 22a
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29512
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Hazel Smith
When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development.
When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29556
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
Don't understand the question
Don't understand the question
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29664
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
The land has not yet been re-developed and it would be counter-productive to introduce restraints which would result in a loss of flexibility at this stage. Commercial buildings will not be constructed for commercial use without an inbuilt and inherently long lifespan for such a use. Alternative uses will not therefore be forthcoming and additional policy restraint is not necessary.
The land has not yet been re-developed and it would be counter-productive to introduce restraints which would result in a loss of flexibility at this stage. Commercial buildings will not be constructed for commercial use without an inbuilt and inherently long lifespan for such a use. Alternative uses will not therefore be forthcoming and additional policy restraint is not necessary.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29771
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
No Comment.
No Comment.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29891
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
Change of use from employment to residential use in a mixed use area could potentially give rise to issues if the property to be changed is in an area where amenity issues may subsequently arise. Removal of prior notification rights is therefore supported.
The employment land should be protected as employment uses. There can be conflicts with some business uses and residential and therefore the master plan will have considered this, allowing change of use may have the effect of pepper potting residential dwellings within established employment areas potentially leading to social isolation.
Change of use from employment to residential use in a mixed use area could potentially give rise to issues if the property to be changed is in an area where amenity issues may subsequently arise. Removal of prior notification rights is therefore supported.
The employment land should be protected as employment uses. There can be conflicts with some business uses and residential and therefore the master plan will have considered this, allowing change of use may have the effect of pepper potting residential dwellings within established employment areas potentially leading to social isolation.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30017
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
AAP aims to create employment hub - this Option would allow piecemeal housing for which buildings not specifically designed and could lead to areas of isolated housing not compatible with in an employment area.
AAP aims to create employment hub - this Option would allow piecemeal housing for which buildings not specifically designed and could lead to areas of isolated housing not compatible with in an employment area.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30152
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30274
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited
Agent: Carter Jonas
Yes, Turnstone do not consider there to be any particular reason for protecting employment uses beyond normal planning rules. It is considered that the market will determine what is appropriate over time, and it is not considered very likely that there will be any great pressure to achieve non-commercial uses on sites in the CNFE.
Yes, Turnstone do not consider there to be any particular reason for protecting employment uses beyond normal planning rules. It is considered that the market will determine what is appropriate over time, and it is not considered very likely that there will be any great pressure to achieve non-commercial uses on sites in the CNFE.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30315
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
The market should decide.
The market should decide.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30393
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30477
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
An option is included to include specific policies and potentially article 4 directions to protect office space in this area from conversion to residential use under new permitted development rights. TCE do not support this. There is currently a great deal of demand for employment uses and related business uses1 and further control is not necessary at this stage.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30583
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Yes.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30623
Received: 03/02/2015
Respondent: RLW Estates
Agent: Boyer Planning
We object to Option A (reliance upon normal planning rules), as it is considered that the presence of significant constraints to residential development (primarily the odour levels in existence) and the objective of maximising employment development, means that it would be highly desirable for increased protective measures to prevent permitted change of use from office to residential or other uses.
See attached document