Question 24a

Showing comments and forms 1 to 12 of 12

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29242

Received: 08/12/2014

Respondent: Ben Cofield

Representation Summary:

Support, IF access if from Milton Road.

Full text:

Full support, IF access is from Milton Road, thus the guided bus (which should not be guided after Milton Road) would travel on the same road as normal traffic, up to the estate, and then onwards on a normal road via controlled bollards. A right hand filter lane would need to be added here, which should allow enough time for 3 or 4 vehicles to turn right, after the city-bound traffic is stopped. If access is as is the it should be turned into residential accommodation, but as there is nowhere else for these units to go, please create an access road from Milton Road for lorries at least. The current access road could be only for cars, cyclists and pedestrians, or close completely.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29333

Received: 16/12/2014

Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell

Representation Summary:

Given a choice between residential accommodation and more employment, the preference should be for residential accommodation, as more employment just boosts the need for more housing even further.

Full text:

Given a choice between residential accommodation and more employment, the preference should be for residential accommodation, as more employment just boosts the need for more housing even further.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29516

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Hazel Smith

Representation Summary:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Full text:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29670

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29777

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved

Full text:

Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29897

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30160

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30319

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Support Option B.

Full text:

Support Option B.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30397

Received: 04/02/2015

Respondent: Milton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30442

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

As explained in response to Q.11, Anglian Water would not support sensitive development within the 1.5 odour contour line. The introduction of residential uses within the 1.5 odour contour line has a high risk of loss of amenity which may also impact on Anglian Water's ability to operate. Other potentially sensitive development such as the local centre and office uses should also be considered against this risk.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30511

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Representation Summary:

Option A The access issues are clearly of concern to local residents and any improvement in this would be welcomed. It is challenging however, given the varied ownership and legal interests on these industrial estates. It seems that either a wholesale change to residential is required or the status quo.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30586

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Support.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.