Question 25

Showing comments and forms 1 to 12 of 12

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29243

Received: 08/12/2014

Respondent: Ben Cofield

Representation Summary:

It is common sense.

Full text:

It is common sense.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29407

Received: 09/01/2015

Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney

Representation Summary:

Could help be given to employers to aid the setting up of apprenticeships?

Full text:

Could help be given to employers to aid the setting up of apprenticeships?

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29563

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

Defiitely and offer of apprenticeships

Full text:

Defiitely and offer of apprenticeships

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29725

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Whilst the overall objectives within the proposed approach are supported in principle, Brookgate consider that the ability to provide training and employment opportunities for local people and local procurement may not always be possible or appropriate for all businesses, particularly those within the R&D sector operating within an international market context and reliant on attracting the best international talent. It is considered that bespoke solutions to maximise economic and employment benefits should be secured as part of individual applications rather than through a generic and inflexible policy approach. This will ensure better outcomes tailored to individual circumstances without stifling innovation.

Full text:

Whilst the overall objectives within the proposed approach are supported in principle, Brookgate consider that the ability to provide training and employment opportunities for local people and local procurement may not always be possible or appropriate for all businesses, particularly those within the R&D sector operating within an international market context and reliant on attracting the best international talent. It is considered that bespoke solutions to maximise economic and employment benefits should be secured as part of individual applications rather than through a generic and inflexible policy approach. This will ensure better outcomes tailored to individual circumstances without stifling innovation.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29781

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

The policy aims are not consistent with the overall vision of the use classes which will dominate the AAP area, however, if the AAP area refocused its attention to creating a more intense and purposeful industrial hub then the outlined approach is agreeable.

Full text:

The policy aims are not consistent with the overall vision of the use classes which will dominate the AAP area, however, if the AAP area refocused its attention to creating a more intense and purposeful industrial hub then the outlined approach is agreeable.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29900

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Support proposed approach, however, should include reference to apprenticeships to ensure opportunities for all avenues into work and skills development.

Support the aspiration to provide training and employment opportunities for local people if it can realistically be delivered.

The policies regarding local employment are supported, access to employment is a key wider determinant of health and local employment should be encouraged to cater for local residential development.

Full text:

Support proposed approach, however, should include reference to apprenticeships to ensure opportunities for all avenues into work and skills development.

Support the aspiration to provide training and employment opportunities for local people if it can realistically be delivered.

The policies regarding local employment are supported, access to employment is a key wider determinant of health and local employment should be encouraged to cater for local residential development.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30029

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

The AAP cannot be a panacea to resolve Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire employment problems. Whilst local training opportunities, especially apprenticeships etc. should be encouraged it is not a role of the planning system to impose such obligations upon developers.

Full text:

The AAP cannot be a panacea to resolve Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire employment problems. Whilst local training opportunities, especially apprenticeships etc. should be encouraged it is not a role of the planning system to impose such obligations upon developers.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30167

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

Would expect this to potentially go beyond current provisions.

Full text:

Would expect this to potentially go beyond current provisions.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30280

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

Turnstone is supportive of the overall approach that the Council is taking here.

Full text:

Turnstone is supportive of the overall approach that the Council is taking here.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30322

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Local Plans should not interfere at this level, it is for the market supported by central Government policy to worry about these issues.

Full text:

Local Plans should not interfere at this level, it is for the market supported by central Government policy to worry about these issues.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30512

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed approach is supported. This should also reflect the significant training and apprenticeships opportunities that the employment use here could generate, both during construction and afterwards. Cambridge Regional College will be very accessible from this site by Guided Bus or cycling along the Busway.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30590

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.