Question 26a

Showing comments and forms 1 to 9 of 9

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29244

Received: 08/12/2014

Respondent: Ben Cofield

Representation Summary:

I would like to see a hotel here, or 2 hotels, and consider a mixed-used area essential.

Full text:

I would like to see a hotel here, or 2 hotels, and consider a mixed-used area essential.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29278

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

Let existing accommodation plans take account of the project.

Full text:

Let existing accommodation plans take account of the project.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29564

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

Hotel and conferences facilities

Full text:

Hotel and conferences facilities

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29674

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

The development of the new railway station and regeneration of the wider CNFE area will create a demand for a hotel in this location and this should be recognised in the CNFE AAP. The land adjacent to the new station provides a sustainable and easily accessible location for a hotel to serve business users associated with the large number of existing and proposed businesses in the CNFE area. The proposed vision for the CNFE states that the area will embrace modern commercial business needs and ensure that the new area is supported with the right social and community infrastructure.

Full text:

The development of the new railway station and regeneration of the wider CNFE area will create a demand for a hotel in this location and this should be recognised in the CNFE AAP. The land adjacent to the new station provides a sustainable and easily accessible location for a hotel to serve business users associated with the large number of existing and proposed businesses in the CNFE area. The proposed vision for the CNFE states that the area will embrace modern commercial business needs and ensure that the new area is supported with the right social and community infrastructure.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29782

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

An area of land close to the railway station should be provided with dual use allocation of either residential or hotel. If the market demands are great enough the hotel will be developed. The provision of a conference centre could be integrated into the hotel as an ancillary use.

Full text:

An area of land close to the railway station should be provided with dual use allocation of either residential or hotel. If the market demands are great enough the hotel will be developed. The provision of a conference centre could be integrated into the hotel as an ancillary use.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29901

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30168

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30323

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

I support Option C.

Full text:

I support Option C.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30591

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.