Question 27
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29247
Received: 08/12/2014
Respondent: Ben Cofield
As per my diagram attached, I believe a highly mixed development would be the most sustainable. I would have a mix of high rise for commuters, student, Council, and an entire new area of low rise, called Fen Meadows on the south side of the tracks. This would be the ideal situation.
As per my diagram attached, I believe a highly mixed development would be the most sustainable. I would have a mix of high rise for commuters, student, Council, and an entire new area of low rise, called Fen Meadows on the south side of the tracks. This would be the ideal situation.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29279
Received: 10/12/2014
Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited
The mix reflects society's structure.
The mix reflects society's structure.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29408
Received: 09/01/2015
Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney
There should be mainly affordable housing - or inexpensive let properties. Could a small percentage be some form of co-operative housing? Shared dwelling with a mixture of personal and shared living space?
There should be mainly affordable housing - or inexpensive let properties. Could a small percentage be some form of co-operative housing? Shared dwelling with a mixture of personal and shared living space?
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29567
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
Definitely
Definitely
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29611
Received: 27/01/2015
Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam
Would like to see a mix of 40% affordable and remainder market housing.
Would like to see a mix of 40% affordable and remainder market housing.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29678
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
Brookgate object to the proposed approach on housing mix. There is no reference to PRS within the proposed approach and it is not explicitly recognised. The significant increase in demand for PRS needs to be accounted for and its provision actively encouraged within the AAP. Constraints on the CNFE site must be recognised and a realistic housing mix provided. PRS will play an important role in achieving this outcome.
Brookgate object to the proposed approach on housing mix. There is no reference to PRS within the proposed approach and it is not explicitly recognised. The significant increase in demand for PRS needs to be accounted for and its provision actively encouraged within the AAP. Constraints on the CNFE site must be recognised and a realistic housing mix provided. PRS will play an important role in achieving this outcome.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29786
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
To create a truly sustainable community it will be necessary to provide a mix of dwelling types which will result in a range of family units.
To create a truly sustainable community it will be necessary to provide a mix of dwelling types which will result in a range of family units.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29905
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
The need to ensure a balanced housing mix is supported. A mix of house types and tenures can help community cohesion and help maintain a healthy development.
If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
The need to ensure a balanced housing mix is supported. A mix of house types and tenures can help community cohesion and help maintain a healthy development.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30173
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30283
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited
Agent: Carter Jonas
Turnstone does not object outright to housing being delivered at CNFE but is somewhat indifferent to whether there is a need for it and whether it should be pursued. It should certainly not be pursued to anything exceeding the level indicated in the current version of the AAP. If there is to be housing flexibility of tenure should be accepted including affordable housing.
Turnstone does not object outright to housing being delivered at CNFE but is somewhat indifferent to whether there is a need for it and whether it should be pursued. It should certainly not be pursued to anything exceeding the level indicated in the current version of the AAP. If there is to be housing flexibility of tenure should be accepted including affordable housing.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30326
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
No comment.
No comment.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30514
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridge City Council
Support. The type and size of affordable housing should be informed by the City Council's Housing Policy.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30594
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Yes.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.