Question 28

Showing comments and forms 1 to 14 of 14

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29248

Received: 08/12/2014

Respondent: Ben Cofield

Representation Summary:

As per my diagrams, I would rather see a mixture of high-quality Council housing and student accommodation, rather than affordable housing, although it would be possible to include both, however I feel to make developments as attractive as possible to developers, we need to allow them to make reasonable profits on extremely high quality buildings, not like the mess we have at CB1, which, including The Triangle, is a real mess and embarrassment to Cambridge.

Full text:

As per my diagrams, I would rather see a mixture of high-quality Council housing and student accommodation, rather than affordable housing, although it would be possible to include both, however I feel to make developments as attractive as possible to developers, we need to allow them to make reasonable profits on extremely high quality buildings, not like the mess we have at CB1, which, including The Triangle, is a real mess and embarrassment to Cambridge.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29280

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

Let the market function policy free.

Full text:

Let the market function policy free.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29409

Received: 09/01/2015

Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney

Representation Summary:

Or even increase the amount to 50% affordable or more. Affordable = less than 4x average Cambridge salary.

Full text:

Or even increase the amount to 50% affordable or more. Affordable = less than 4x average Cambridge salary.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29519

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Hazel Smith

Representation Summary:

40% affordable housing should apply.

Full text:

40% affordable housing should apply.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29568

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

Yes and must be adhered to

Full text:

Yes and must be adhered to

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29612

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam

Representation Summary:

40% affordable housing should be provided throughout the site.

Full text:

40% affordable housing should be provided throughout the site.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29679

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Subject to viability testing the policy should be applied as proposed. The very heavy infrastructure costs and brownfield nature of the land with associated remediation costs must be recognised and viability is of key importance. Brookgate support the City Council's affordable housing requirements which offer a graduated approach to affordable provision which differentiates between different scales of development. South Cambridgeshire policy is less flexible. Consideration should however be given to PRS developments where a different approach may be required, such as discounted market rents, off-site contributions toward affordable housing provision etc

Full text:

Subject to viability testing the policy should be applied as proposed. The very heavy infrastructure costs and brownfield nature of the land with associated remediation costs must be recognised and viability is of key importance. Brookgate support the City Council's affordable housing requirements which offer a graduated approach to affordable provision which differentiates between different scales of development. South Cambridgeshire policy is less flexible. Consideration should however be given to PRS developments where a different approach may be required, such as discounted market rents, off-site contributions toward affordable housing provision etc

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29787

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29907

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Affordable housing requirements should be subject to viability and development will need to mitigate a range of services such as education and transport.

Full text:

If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Affordable housing requirements should be subject to viability and development will need to mitigate a range of services such as education and transport.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30174

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

Support subject to a detailed testing of viability to ensure delivery across a significant timeframe and meet the vision and objectives.

Full text:

Support subject to a detailed testing of viability to ensure delivery across a significant timeframe and meet the vision and objectives.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30327

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30400

Received: 04/02/2015

Respondent: Milton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

40% affordable housing should apply.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30515

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Representation Summary:

Support. The CNFE should be treated in the same way as any other development and this supports a more balanced community as well as housing located by employment use.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30595

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.