Question 29a

Support

Representation ID: 29281

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Agree.

Support

Representation ID: 29569

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

As long as it is reasonable priced

Support

Representation ID: 29680

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Option A is our preferred option but Option A can also deliver excellent places to live with no adverse impacts on the economic/social mix of the future residential community. This is clearly demonstrated in numerous schemes across the country, such as East Village in Stratford and Clippers Quay in Salford, Manchester.
We do not believe that detailed guidance is necessary as existing policies aim to deliver quality places to live. In addition, there is significant guidance already published that could be beneficially referenced by the authorities.

Support

Representation ID: 29908

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Support, allow the market to deliver private rented accommodation rather than encourage it given the uncertain implications.

Support

Representation ID: 30175

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments

Agent: AECOM

No additional comment

Support

Representation ID: 30328

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

No comment.

Support

Representation ID: 30516

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Option A Private rented accommodation is market housing not Affordable Housing. There is no evidence to justify a planning policy intervention to warrant Option B.