Question 30a

Showing comments and forms 1 to 11 of 11

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29571

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

No more please

Full text:

No more please

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29614

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam

Representation Summary:

I would support Option A or B (up to 20% student housing but no more.)

Full text:

I would support Option A or B (up to 20% student housing but no more.)

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29683

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

The market has expressed an interest in the provision of student housing in the CNFE area and this need should be accommodated.

Full text:

The market has expressed an interest in the provision of student housing in the CNFE area and this need should be accommodated.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29788

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 9.28 specifically states that the market has expressed an interest in student accommodation. Failure to acknowledge clear market signals does not accord with the advice of the NPPF.

Full text:

Paragraph 9.28 specifically states that the market has expressed an interest in student accommodation. Failure to acknowledge clear market signals does not accord with the advice of the NPPF.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29911

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Support especially as the need for student accommodation in the area has yet to be made.

Full text:

If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Support especially as the need for student accommodation in the area has yet to be made.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30179

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30330

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

It is too far/remote from the Universities and substantial facilities.

Full text:

It is too far/remote from the Universities and substantial facilities.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30448

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

As covered in response to Q.11 above, Anglian Water does not support sensitive development within the

1.5 odour contour line. Anglian Water consider potentially sensitive development that might include hotel and conferring centre and student accommodation within this 1.5 odour contour line as unacceptable due to the risk of odour adversely affecting the occupants of these buildings and would advise caution in considering any such proposal.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30517

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Representation Summary:

Option A. If there is evidence of demand for student accommodation in this location or some of the proposals for the CNFE create such demand, then it would be sensible to make such provision. It is considered that as there are no educational institutions in the immediate vicinity, there would seem to be limited demand for student accommodation in this location. This location could also leave students isolated as there are limited facilities available unless there is significant provision on site within the AAP area.

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30597

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30656

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

TCE broadly support the inclusion of student accommodation in the CNFE area; however, this must be as a complementary use with the focus being on employment and research and development uses, and any large scale developments should not be permitted.

Full text:

See attached document