Question 31

Showing comments and forms 1 to 12 of 12

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29249

Received: 08/12/2014

Respondent: Ben Cofield

Representation Summary:

We need as many amenities on site as possible.

Full text:

We need as many amenities on site as possible.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29283

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

Some regulation is necessary to provide a wider range of services especially from SMEs.

Full text:

Some regulation is necessary to provide a wider range of services especially from SMEs.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29444

Received: 17/01/2015

Respondent: Nicky Morland

Representation Summary:

Assuming Community facilities includes education and health provision then consideration MUST be given early on to provision of schools and health centres where the accommodation is being increased.

Full text:

Assuming Community facilities includes education and health provision then consideration MUST be given early on to provision of schools and health centres where the accommodation is being increased.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29572

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

Education and health services must be provided especially as there is already one school in Nuffield Road and a Doctors's Surgery

Full text:

Education and health services must be provided especially as there is already one school in Nuffield Road and a Doctors's Surgery

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29615

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam

Representation Summary:

Provision of community facilities need to be allowed for in the original design and built as the development becomes occupied. Leisure/sporting facilities could be built at the northern and eastern edges of the site (as an acoustic barrier to the A14 and railway)

Full text:

Provision of community facilities need to be allowed for in the original design and built as the development becomes occupied. Leisure/sporting facilities could be built at the northern and eastern edges of the site (as an acoustic barrier to the A14 and railway)

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29688

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Brookgate support the proposed approach. In order for the regeneration of the CNFE area to be successful the required services and facilities must be provided. This will require collaborative strategies between key stakeholders and will be easier to achieve on sites such as CB4, where large areas can be brought forward by relatively few stakeholders, simplifying the planning and engagement process. The delivery of such services and facilities is essential to ensure the creation of a vibrant, mixed use neighbourhood, as set out in the proposed vision.

Full text:

Brookgate support the proposed approach. In order for the regeneration of the CNFE area to be successful the required services and facilities must be provided. This will require collaborative strategies between key stakeholders and will be easier to achieve on sites such as CB4, where large areas can be brought forward by relatively few stakeholders, simplifying the planning and engagement process. The delivery of such services and facilities is essential to ensure the creation of a vibrant, mixed use neighbourhood, as set out in the proposed vision.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29917

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed approach to the delivery of supporting services is supported in principle. The location of facilities must have regard to other development in the locality, so potential amenity issues arising from proximity to the Water Recycling Centre, waste management uses, and the railheads are avoided and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Supportive of this policy, especially regarding co-location of services for community, retail and leisure uses.

The proposal on services and facilities are supported. Community facilities should be provided early in the development of the residential component of the development. Services and facilities should include community development.

Full text:

The proposed approach to the delivery of supporting services is supported in principle. However, the location of facilities must have regard to other development existing or proposed in the locality, so that potential amenity issues arising for example from proximity to the Water Recycling Centre, waste management uses, and the railheads are avoided and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Supportive of this policy, especially regarding co-location of services for community, retail and leisure uses.

The proposal on services and facilities are supported. Community facilities should be provided early in the development of the residential component of the development. Services and facilities should include community development.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30032

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

Aims to provide appropriate measure at right time, and with effective management/maintenance.

Full text:

Aims to provide appropriate measure at right time, and with effective management/maintenance.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30187

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30333

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

The Science Park is a good example of this approach working.

Full text:

The Science Park is a good example of this approach working.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30518

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Representation Summary:

Support. Balanced, sustainable community requires such services and facilities as do the employees working locally. It is considered important that these are not too fragmented across the CNFE as that could reduce their viability or contribution to extended opening hours and thus service provision.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30602

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.