Question 31
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29249
Received: 08/12/2014
Respondent: Ben Cofield
We need as many amenities on site as possible.
We need as many amenities on site as possible.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29283
Received: 10/12/2014
Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited
Some regulation is necessary to provide a wider range of services especially from SMEs.
Some regulation is necessary to provide a wider range of services especially from SMEs.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29444
Received: 17/01/2015
Respondent: Nicky Morland
Assuming Community facilities includes education and health provision then consideration MUST be given early on to provision of schools and health centres where the accommodation is being increased.
Assuming Community facilities includes education and health provision then consideration MUST be given early on to provision of schools and health centres where the accommodation is being increased.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29572
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
Education and health services must be provided especially as there is already one school in Nuffield Road and a Doctors's Surgery
Education and health services must be provided especially as there is already one school in Nuffield Road and a Doctors's Surgery
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29615
Received: 27/01/2015
Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam
Provision of community facilities need to be allowed for in the original design and built as the development becomes occupied. Leisure/sporting facilities could be built at the northern and eastern edges of the site (as an acoustic barrier to the A14 and railway)
Provision of community facilities need to be allowed for in the original design and built as the development becomes occupied. Leisure/sporting facilities could be built at the northern and eastern edges of the site (as an acoustic barrier to the A14 and railway)
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29688
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
Brookgate support the proposed approach. In order for the regeneration of the CNFE area to be successful the required services and facilities must be provided. This will require collaborative strategies between key stakeholders and will be easier to achieve on sites such as CB4, where large areas can be brought forward by relatively few stakeholders, simplifying the planning and engagement process. The delivery of such services and facilities is essential to ensure the creation of a vibrant, mixed use neighbourhood, as set out in the proposed vision.
Brookgate support the proposed approach. In order for the regeneration of the CNFE area to be successful the required services and facilities must be provided. This will require collaborative strategies between key stakeholders and will be easier to achieve on sites such as CB4, where large areas can be brought forward by relatively few stakeholders, simplifying the planning and engagement process. The delivery of such services and facilities is essential to ensure the creation of a vibrant, mixed use neighbourhood, as set out in the proposed vision.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29917
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
The proposed approach to the delivery of supporting services is supported in principle. The location of facilities must have regard to other development in the locality, so potential amenity issues arising from proximity to the Water Recycling Centre, waste management uses, and the railheads are avoided and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Supportive of this policy, especially regarding co-location of services for community, retail and leisure uses.
The proposal on services and facilities are supported. Community facilities should be provided early in the development of the residential component of the development. Services and facilities should include community development.
The proposed approach to the delivery of supporting services is supported in principle. However, the location of facilities must have regard to other development existing or proposed in the locality, so that potential amenity issues arising for example from proximity to the Water Recycling Centre, waste management uses, and the railheads are avoided and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Supportive of this policy, especially regarding co-location of services for community, retail and leisure uses.
The proposal on services and facilities are supported. Community facilities should be provided early in the development of the residential component of the development. Services and facilities should include community development.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30032
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Aims to provide appropriate measure at right time, and with effective management/maintenance.
Aims to provide appropriate measure at right time, and with effective management/maintenance.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30187
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30333
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
The Science Park is a good example of this approach working.
The Science Park is a good example of this approach working.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30518
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridge City Council
Support. Balanced, sustainable community requires such services and facilities as do the employees working locally. It is considered important that these are not too fragmented across the CNFE as that could reduce their viability or contribution to extended opening hours and thus service provision.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30602
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Yes.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.