Question 38a

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29337

Received: 16/12/2014

Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell

Representation Summary:

The car parking restrictions in appendix L8 of the referenced documents are far too tight - see what has happened about car parking in Orchard Park.

Full text:

The car parking restrictions in appendix L8 of the referenced documents are far too tight - see what has happened about car parking in Orchard Park.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29702

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Brookgate support the use of car parking standards across the whole area that are more restrictive than the car parking standards policy set by the Cambridge City Council car parking standards, to reflect the highly sustainable location. The current policy however forms a useful starting point in discussions over car parking levels.

Full text:

Brookgate support the use of car parking standards across the whole area that are more restrictive than the car parking standards policy set by the Cambridge City Council car parking standards, to reflect the highly sustainable location. The current policy however forms a useful starting point in discussions over car parking levels.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29935

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport, thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe. The County Council therefore considers that more detailed consideration of parking numbers, and approach to parking provision, will be required including detailed assessment of non-car trip patterns, mode split targets, the relationship to standards, potential for shared use of parking across different land uses, and impacts of traffic on networks

Full text:

As noted above, car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and careful consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport access to the site, and thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe. The County Council therefore considers that more detailed consideration of parking numbers, and the approach to parking provision, will be required including inter-alia detailed assessment of non-car trip patterns, mode split targets, the relationship to standards, the potential for shared use of parking across different land uses, and impacts of vehicular traffic on the highway networks

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30055

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

Parking standards should not be more onerous than in the rest of the city especially given the location on the edge of the settlement.

Full text:

Parking standards should not be more onerous than in the rest of the city especially given the location on the edge of the settlement.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30199

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30346

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

This is the least worst Option.

Full text:

This is the least worst Option.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30484

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

TCE do not support a restriction in car parking standards or further cycle parking spaces. TCE support Option A for the CNFE AAP to include CCC adopted car parking standards and cycle parking standards.

Full text:

See attached document