Question 22b
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29275
Received: 10/12/2014
Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited
Employment must be coordinated with residential.
Employment must be coordinated with residential.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29331
Received: 16/12/2014
Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell
If there is greater need for residential than office or laboratory space, then that is what should happen, particularly as more office and lab space just boosts the need for residential space even further.
If there is greater need for residential than office or laboratory space, then that is what should happen, particularly as more office and lab space just boosts the need for residential space even further.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29403
Received: 09/01/2015
Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney
We need a mix of residential and employment opportunities.
We need a mix of residential and employment opportunities.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29513
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Hazel Smith
When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development. Any extra housing (as I mentioned at Q13) should be planned for in the masterplan as a later phase.
When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development. Any extra housing (as I mentioned at Q13) should be planned for in the masterplan as a later phase.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29557
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
Don't understand the question again
Don't understand the question again
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29665
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
The land has not yet been re-developed and it would be counter-productive to introduce restraints which would result in a loss of flexibility at this stage. An Article 4 Direction could be introduced at a later date if it was deemed appropriate and necessary. Commercial buildings will not be constructed for commercial use without an inbuilt and inherently long lifespan for such a use. Alternative uses will not therefore be forthcoming and additional policy restraint is not necessary
The land has not yet been re-developed and it would be counter-productive to introduce restraints which would result in a loss of flexibility at this stage. An Article 4 Direction could be introduced at a later date if it was deemed appropriate and necessary. Commercial buildings will not be constructed for commercial use without an inbuilt and inherently long lifespan for such a use. Alternative uses will not therefore be forthcoming and additional policy restraint is not necessary
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29772
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
No comment.
No comment.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29892
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
Change of use from employment to residential use in a mixed use area could potentially give rise to issues if the property to be changed is in an area where amenity issues may subsequently arise. Removal of prior notification rights is therefore supported.
Support in order to protect new employment development from conversion to residential.
Change of use from employment to residential use in a mixed use area could potentially give rise to issues if the property to be changed is in an area where amenity issues may subsequently arise. Removal of prior notification rights is therefore supported.
Support in order to protect new employment development from conversion to residential.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30020
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Appropriate to prevent piecemeal growth of housing in inappropriate locations.
Appropriate to prevent piecemeal growth of housing in inappropriate locations.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30153
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30276
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited
Agent: Carter Jonas
Turnstone do not consider it strictly necessary to consider serving an Article 4 direction. Accordingly they would oppose this notion.
Turnstone do not consider it strictly necessary to consider serving an Article 4 direction. Accordingly they would oppose this notion.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30316
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
This site should be business/commercial/high tech.
This site should be business/commercial/high tech.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30394
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development. Any extra housing (as mentioned at Q13) should be planned for in the masterplan as a later phase.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30509
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridge City Council
Option B. The flexibility to allow change of use to residential without planning permission was introduced to bring redundant commercial property back into beneficial use in areas where there was no demand for commercial property (or the commercial property did not meet market requirements and so was unlettable). Given the demand in Cambridge and that demand will be met by property designed to meet current tenant expectations, this will not apply on CNFE and so there should be a policy to protect new employment development (at least for a reasonable time period).
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30584
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
No.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30624
Received: 03/02/2015
Respondent: RLW Estates
Agent: Boyer Planning
We support Option B, the introduction of additional measures to prevent permitted change of use from office to residential or other uses as the presence of significant constraints to residential development (primarily the odour levels in existence) and the objective of maximising employment development make this highly desirable, as noted in our response to Question 22a.
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30654
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
An option is included to include specific policies and potentially article 4 directions to protect office space in this area from conversion to residential use under new permitted development rights. TCE do not support this. There is currently a great deal of demand for employment uses and related business uses1 and further control is not necessary at this stage.
See attached document