Question 22b

Showing comments and forms 1 to 17 of 17

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29275

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

Employment must be coordinated with residential.

Full text:

Employment must be coordinated with residential.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29331

Received: 16/12/2014

Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell

Representation Summary:

If there is greater need for residential than office or laboratory space, then that is what should happen, particularly as more office and lab space just boosts the need for residential space even further.

Full text:

If there is greater need for residential than office or laboratory space, then that is what should happen, particularly as more office and lab space just boosts the need for residential space even further.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29403

Received: 09/01/2015

Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney

Representation Summary:

We need a mix of residential and employment opportunities.

Full text:

We need a mix of residential and employment opportunities.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29513

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Hazel Smith

Representation Summary:

When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development. Any extra housing (as I mentioned at Q13) should be planned for in the masterplan as a later phase.

Full text:

When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development. Any extra housing (as I mentioned at Q13) should be planned for in the masterplan as a later phase.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29557

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

Don't understand the question again

Full text:

Don't understand the question again

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29665

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

The land has not yet been re-developed and it would be counter-productive to introduce restraints which would result in a loss of flexibility at this stage. An Article 4 Direction could be introduced at a later date if it was deemed appropriate and necessary. Commercial buildings will not be constructed for commercial use without an inbuilt and inherently long lifespan for such a use. Alternative uses will not therefore be forthcoming and additional policy restraint is not necessary

Full text:

The land has not yet been re-developed and it would be counter-productive to introduce restraints which would result in a loss of flexibility at this stage. An Article 4 Direction could be introduced at a later date if it was deemed appropriate and necessary. Commercial buildings will not be constructed for commercial use without an inbuilt and inherently long lifespan for such a use. Alternative uses will not therefore be forthcoming and additional policy restraint is not necessary

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29772

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29892

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Change of use from employment to residential use in a mixed use area could potentially give rise to issues if the property to be changed is in an area where amenity issues may subsequently arise. Removal of prior notification rights is therefore supported.

Support in order to protect new employment development from conversion to residential.

Full text:

Change of use from employment to residential use in a mixed use area could potentially give rise to issues if the property to be changed is in an area where amenity issues may subsequently arise. Removal of prior notification rights is therefore supported.

Support in order to protect new employment development from conversion to residential.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30020

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

Appropriate to prevent piecemeal growth of housing in inappropriate locations.

Full text:

Appropriate to prevent piecemeal growth of housing in inappropriate locations.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30153

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30276

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

Turnstone do not consider it strictly necessary to consider serving an Article 4 direction. Accordingly they would oppose this notion.

Full text:

Turnstone do not consider it strictly necessary to consider serving an Article 4 direction. Accordingly they would oppose this notion.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30316

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

This site should be business/commercial/high tech.

Full text:

This site should be business/commercial/high tech.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30394

Received: 04/02/2015

Respondent: Milton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

When an area has been carefully considered at AAP level and facilities to support certain uses have been planned in, increasing residential uses at a later stage without the space for extra green areas, school places, parking, etc just leads to sub-standard development. Any extra housing (as mentioned at Q13) should be planned for in the masterplan as a later phase.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30509

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Representation Summary:

Option B. The flexibility to allow change of use to residential without planning permission was introduced to bring redundant commercial property back into beneficial use in areas where there was no demand for commercial property (or the commercial property did not meet market requirements and so was unlettable). Given the demand in Cambridge and that demand will be met by property designed to meet current tenant expectations, this will not apply on CNFE and so there should be a policy to protect new employment development (at least for a reasonable time period).

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30584

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30624

Received: 03/02/2015

Respondent: RLW Estates

Agent: Boyer Planning

Representation Summary:

We support Option B, the introduction of additional measures to prevent permitted change of use from office to residential or other uses as the presence of significant constraints to residential development (primarily the odour levels in existence) and the objective of maximising employment development make this highly desirable, as noted in our response to Question 22a.

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30654

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

An option is included to include specific policies and potentially article 4 directions to protect office space in this area from conversion to residential use under new permitted development rights. TCE do not support this. There is currently a great deal of demand for employment uses and related business uses1 and further control is not necessary at this stage.

Full text:

See attached document