Question 24b

Showing comments and forms 1 to 10 of 10

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29277

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

Sensible.

Full text:

Sensible.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29517

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Hazel Smith

Representation Summary:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Full text:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29671

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29778

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

Full text:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30162

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30320

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

It would make for better zoning.

Full text:

It would make for better zoning.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30398

Received: 04/02/2015

Respondent: Milton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30443

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

As explained in response to Q.11, Anglian Water would not support sensitive development within the 1.5 odour contour line. The introduction of residential uses within the 1.5 odour contour line has a high risk of loss of amenity which may also impact on Anglian Water's ability to operate. Other potentially sensitive development such as the local centre and office uses should also be considered against this risk.

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30587

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30630

Received: 27/03/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment