Question 26c

Showing comments and forms 1 to 12 of 12

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29246

Received: 08/12/2014

Respondent: Ben Cofield

Representation Summary:

Essential to have at least one hotel with conference facilities, as it can be hard to get a central location for a conference, plus it would reduce traffic movements in the city centre.

Full text:

Essential to have at least one hotel with conference facilities, as it can be hard to get a central location for a conference, plus it would reduce traffic movements in the city centre.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29676

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Support, however the provision of conference facilities should be subject to viability. The new railway station and regeneration of the wider CNFE area will create a demand for a hotel and conference facility. The land adjacent to the new station provides a sustainable and accessible location for a hotel and conference centre to serve business users associated with existing and proposed businesses in the CNFE area. This accords with the proposed CNFE vision which states that the area will embrace modern commercial business needs and ensure that the new area is supported with the right social and community infrastructure.

Full text:

Support, however the provision of conference facilities should be subject to viability. The new railway station and regeneration of the wider CNFE area will create a demand for a hotel and conference facility. The land adjacent to the new station provides a sustainable and accessible location for a hotel and conference centre to serve business users associated with existing and proposed businesses in the CNFE area. This accords with the proposed CNFE vision which states that the area will embrace modern commercial business needs and ensure that the new area is supported with the right social and community infrastructure.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29784

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

An area of land close to the railway station should be provided with dual use allocation of either residential or hotel. If the market demands are great enough the hotel will be developed. The provision of a conference centre could be integrated into the hotel as an ancillary use.

Full text:

An area of land close to the railway station should be provided with dual use allocation of either residential or hotel. If the market demands are great enough the hotel will be developed. The provision of a conference centre could be integrated into the hotel as an ancillary use.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29903

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

If a hotel is provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Full text:

If a hotel is provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30031

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

Would support business uses on CNFE and Science Park.

Full text:

Would support business uses on CNFE and Science Park.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30170

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30216

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Urban&Civic Ltd

Agent: David Lock Associates

Representation Summary:

Option C, provision of hotel and conference centre close to the station, is supported as part of the mix.

Full text:

Option C, provision of hotel and conference centre close to the station, is supported as part of the mix.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30245

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Maciej W Rozycki

Representation Summary:

Having both available will be a natural addition to the rail station serving businesses located both here and at the Science Park, allowing their visitors to stay away from the city centre during the business hours, and especially to avoid contributing to traffic by travelling to/from there in the rush hour.

Full text:

Having both available will be a natural addition to the rail station serving businesses located both here and at the Science Park, allowing their visitors to stay away from the city centre during the business hours, and especially to avoid contributing to traffic by travelling to/from there in the rush hour.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30325

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

This would be logical and enhance the area.

Full text:

This would be logical and enhance the area.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30447

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

As covered in response to Q.11 above, Anglian Water does not support sensitive development within the

1.5 odour contour line. Anglian Water consider potentially sensitive development that might include hotel and conferring centre and student accommodation within this 1.5 odour contour line as unacceptable due to the risk of odour adversely affecting the occupants of these buildings and would advise caution in considering any such proposal.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30593

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30655

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

TCE support the provision of a hotel and/or conference facilities within the mixed-use development of land around the proposed new railway station, on the basis that this would be a supporting use with the focus remaining on employment and office floor space.

Full text:

See attached document