Question 37b

Showing comments and forms 1 to 14 of 14

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29289

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

If it has to be so, then yes.

Full text:

If it has to be so, then yes.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29414

Received: 09/01/2015

Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney

Representation Summary:

This will free up space for other uses

Full text:

This will free up space for other uses

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29422

Received: 13/01/2015

Respondent: Ben Cofield

Representation Summary:

Of course the possibility to have a multi-storey car park should be there!!! Cambridge North could, and possibly should be, a new city centre, so we will need considerably more parking than is currently proposed in the future.

Full text:

Of course the possibility to have a multi-storey car park should be there!!! Cambridge North could, and possibly should be, a new city centre, so we will need considerably more parking than is currently proposed in the future.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29446

Received: 17/01/2015

Respondent: Nicky Morland

Representation Summary:

Makes better use of the land and not everyone can walk or cycle to the station. If they use the bus there be appropriate public transport when the late trains arrive from London?

Full text:

Makes better use of the land and not everyone can walk or cycle to the station. If they use the bus there be appropriate public transport when the late trains arrive from London?

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29620

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam

Representation Summary:

I think a multi-storey car park makes more sense. Witness the pressure on parking at the main station. Not everyone can walk or cycle.

Full text:

I think a multi-storey car park makes more sense. Witness the pressure on parking at the main station. Not everyone can walk or cycle.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29700

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Brookgate support the location of a surface car park that makes best use of the overall site. As discussed in response to Q37a, it is recommended that the surface car park is constructed adjacent to the existing main railway line to the north of the new station building as per redevelopment Option 2a (appended to this submission). The surface car park could be laid out in a conventional rectangular footprint which is more efficient in terms of the number of spaces and provides flexibility to convert to a multi-storey car park if there is sufficient future demand.

Full text:

Brookgate support the location of a surface car park that makes best use of the overall site. As discussed in response to Q37a, it is recommended that the surface car park is constructed adjacent to the existing main railway line to the north of the new station building as per redevelopment Option 2a (appended to this submission). The surface car park could be laid out in a conventional rectangular footprint which is more efficient in terms of the number of spaces and provides flexibility to convert to a multi-storey car park if there is sufficient future demand.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29827

Received: 31/01/2015

Respondent: Mr David Collier

Representation Summary:

Important to make best use of the available space.

Full text:

Important to make best use of the available space.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29933

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

The County Council would wish to consider the form of car parking provision at a later date when further details are known. It is important to note, however, that car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and careful consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport access to the site, and thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe

Full text:

The County Council would wish to consider the form of car parking provision at a later date when further details are known. It is important to note, however, that car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and careful consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport access to the site, and thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30052

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

Provides more flexibility and realistic longer term solution, although no details of capacity given.

Full text:

Provides more flexibility and realistic longer term solution, although no details of capacity given.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30198

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30227

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Urban&Civic Ltd

Agent: David Lock Associates

Representation Summary:

Support. The efficient use of land is supported in this key Cambridge North location where strong sustainable transport links are already in place and will be enhanced between existing and new communities, including Waterbeach New Town.

Full text:

Support. The efficient use of land is supported in this key Cambridge North location where strong sustainable transport links are already in place and will be enhanced between existing and new communities, including Waterbeach New Town.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30345

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

This will ensure that more people will have the ability to use the station.

Full text:

This will ensure that more people will have the ability to use the station.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30524

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge City Council

Representation Summary:

Option B. This maximises land use, potentially enables a wider range of land uses and should enable more residential development away from the odour footprint.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30607

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.