Question 39b

Showing comments and forms 1 to 12 of 12

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29291

Received: 10/12/2014

Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

Yes.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29307

Received: 11/12/2014

Respondent: Stanton Shallcross

Representation Summary:

The more available cycle parking, the more attractive this area will be to cycle to. Fighting for spaces is already very off-putting to those trying to get to the city centre station, so let's not make the same mistake here.

Full text:

The more available cycle parking, the more attractive this area will be to cycle to. Fighting for spaces is already very off-putting to those trying to get to the city centre station, so let's not make the same mistake here.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29340

Received: 16/12/2014

Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell

Representation Summary:

Providing even greater amounts of cycle parking that are expected to be used seems an appropriate way to encourage people to use cycles. If you are hoping that some workers will arrive by train and then cycle to locations on the Science Park, then you need to provide sufficient secure cycle storage to enable people to leave their cycles at the station overnight and at weekends.

Full text:

Providing even greater amounts of cycle parking that are expected to be used seems an appropriate way to encourage people to use cycles. If you are hoping that some workers will arrive by train and then cycle to locations on the Science Park, then you need to provide sufficient secure cycle storage to enable people to leave their cycles at the station overnight and at weekends.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29579

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

With cycle racks that are not like those towers at Cambridge Station!

Full text:

With cycle racks that are not like those towers at Cambridge Station!

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29707

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Brookgate object to higher cycle parking standards as the current standards are sufficient to deal with the likely demand for cycle parking in areas with good cycle infrastructure and connectivity.

Full text:

Brookgate object to higher cycle parking standards as the current standards are sufficient to deal with the likely demand for cycle parking in areas with good cycle infrastructure and connectivity.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29828

Received: 31/01/2015

Respondent: Mr David Collier

Representation Summary:

Since this development aims to achieve higher cycling levels, certainly a higher standard of cycle parking will be needed. It would be absurd to create a pleasant cycling environment but not require there to be enough spaces for all potential users.

Full text:

Since this development aims to achieve higher cycling levels, certainly a higher standard of cycle parking will be needed. It would be absurd to create a pleasant cycling environment but not require there to be enough spaces for all potential users.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29940

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Cycle parking provision at least in line with standards will be required. However, further more detailed analysis will be needed on cycle mode share and targets to determine an appropriate level that seeks to maximise cycle access to the area. This is likely to confirm a level of provision in excess of standards given the high levels of non-car mode split likely to be required but as noted this will require further, more detailed, analysis.

Increased cycle parking is in line with increasing modal share to walking and Cycling, and Active Transport is a key wider determinant of health.

Full text:

The ability to park a cycle in a safe, secure, and convenient location is a key aspect of encouraging and supporting travel by bike. The County Council considers that cycle parking provision at least in line with standards will be required. However, further more detailed analysis will be needed on cycle mode share and targets to determine an appropriate level that seeks to maximise cycle access to the area. This is likely to confirm a level of provision in excess of standards given the high levels of non-car mode split likely to be required but as noted this will require further, more detailed, analysis.

Increased cycle parking is in line with increasing modal share to walking and Cycling, and Active Transport is a key wider determinant of health.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30069

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

New cycleways will encourage more cycling and therefore higher level of provision likely.

Full text:

New cycleways will encourage more cycling and therefore higher level of provision likely.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30203

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments Limited

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

Consideration to be given to higher standard to reflect sustainability of location.

Full text:

Consideration to be given to higher standard to reflect sustainability of location.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30232

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Urban&Civic Ltd

Agent: David Lock Associates

Representation Summary:

Option B (Higher Standards) is supported because this would be more likely to maximise the potential for employees and visitors to travel by bike, for example between Waterbeach New Town and the CNFE Area.

Full text:

Option B (Higher Standards) is supported because this would be more likely to maximise the potential for employees and visitors to travel by bike, for example between Waterbeach New Town and the CNFE Area.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30428

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Tom McKeown

Representation Summary:

The Campaign supports Option B: higher cycle parking standard across the whole area to reflect the highly sustainable location. High-quality, easily accessible and available cycle parking throughout the site is entirely appropriate for enabling high cycling use at all destinations - employment, residential and the station. The Campaign also recommends secure, covered cycle parking in residential areas as these reduce theft and deterioration of residents' bikes.

Full text:

See attached document

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30609

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.