4.2.16

It is considered that paragraph 4.2.16 is too prescriptive and fails to provide flexibility and choice. It is accepted that private amenity space is a valuable resource and should be encouraged. However, each site will have varying opportunities and constraints. Requiring each individual property to have access to private amenity space is not necessarily beneficial to either the prospective occupiers or the surrounding environment and intended design. In certain circumstances it may be more desirable to provide a larger shared amenity space as opposed to a small terrace or balcony with limited functional use. This flexibility would also reflect the significant, high quality public open space in the wider area with Jesus Green directly to the south.
The current wording of the SPD fails to appreciate the need to address each individual site. It is suggested that it is reworded to state:
'Access to private amenity space in the form of roof gardens, balconies and/or winter gardens should be encouraged. Where provided, it is essential that these amenity areas...'