4.3.20

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Support

Mitcham's Corner Development Framework SPD

Representation ID: 31335

Received: 10/10/2016

Respondent: Dr Alastair J Reid

Representation Summary:

Yes, and a through way to Victoria Road would be really useful.

Full text:

Yes, and a through way to Victoria Road would be really useful.

Object

Mitcham's Corner Development Framework SPD

Representation ID: 31406

Received: 17/10/2016

Respondent: Telereal Trillium

Agent: Savills

Representation Summary:

It is suggested that the second sentence should encourage the specified connections rather than stating that they should be provided. This would better reflect the first sentence and the uncertainty.

Full text:

4.3.20 is too prescriptive.
The paragraph starts by acknowledging that reconnections should be made 'where feasible' which is supported. This highlights that specific connections cannot be fixed at this pre-design stage.
It is therefore suggested that the subsequent sentence should reflect this uncertainty by encouraging the specified connections rather than stating that they should be provided. It is suggested that 4.3.20 is updated to read as follows:
'Development should reconnect with existing streets and spaces where feasible. Links from Chesterton Road into the site and reconnecting through to Grasmere Gardens are encouraged. If incorporated, these new linkages could be restricted to through access for cycles and pedestrians only and possess a more intimate green lane character, where space is shared'.