Question 1

Showing forms 421 to 450 of 479
Form ID: 55290
Respondent: Liz Shee

Disagree

Too much development. More traffic to an already congested area.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55302
Respondent: Mr Ze'ev Feigis

Neither agree nor disagree

We can do better! Be innovative, denser! PLANT A FORREST! Go extreme and lead by example. 50% affordable!

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55325
Respondent: Barry John Buck

Strongly agree

A well balanced vision for the future area. In my opinion CWWTP shpuld be sited as shown on Anglian Water Relocation Project in area 3 IE Horningsea (nearest to present site & other side of A14)

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55335
Respondent: M Isherwood

Nothing chosen

13 storeys is way too high. How are you going to ensure that there is "no additional vehicular movements" on Milton Road.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55340
Respondent: Mrs JJ Lister

Strongly disagree

I strongly object to this development and feel that Anglian Water site where it is could be updated there for this project should not go ahead

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55355
Respondent: Elizabeth Simmonds

Agree

No comment.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55365
Respondent: Mr M J Whitaker

Strongly disagree

There is no provision for disabled/elderly infirm people. Many can drive but cannot cycle, take the bus or walk far. Where are the care homes, GP surgeries? The Stalin-style architecture does not fit comfortably.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55375
Respondent: Danielle Whittaker

Disagree

Won't happen soon enough!

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55385
Respondent: Mr Stephen Mare

Neither agree nor disagree

Look overpopulated

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55395
Respondent: Chris Lowdon

Disagree

High density housing blocks are antisocial compared to street housing. They are problematic if social distancing is needed in the future. These blocks are only slightly better than tower blocks.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55405
Respondent: R Tripp

Disagree

Noise from the A14 What about that? Buildings too high! 3 storey max?

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55415
Respondent: Paula Meaney

Disagree

Too high density and unrealistic expectations for minimal car ownership, use and impact

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55425
Respondent: Susan Thomas

Strongly disagree

Too high density

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55435
Respondent: Scott Gibson

Agree

I think it is important for people on low incomes to live in Cambridge

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55445
Respondent: John Walker

Neither agree nor disagree

No comment.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55455
Respondent: Samantha Newman

Strongly disagree

Overdeveloped, ill considered. You don't even say why any of this is needed.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55472
Respondent: MS Farrar

Neither agree nor disagree

Good. Takes the pressure off developing green belt land. Most likely buyers for investment rather than local people.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55482
Respondent: Sue Merry

Strongly disagree

Why on earth are you planning to move something that doesn't need to change? Why not develop the sites you are planning to move to? Who wants to live on a site smelling of sh*t?

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55492
Respondent: J Parker

Strongly disagree

Pathetic! You are creating future slums. Who wants to bring up a family in multi-storey flats with no space for parking?

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55502
Respondent: Jayne Neale

Strongly disagree

Another 'new town' that's not needed. Having tall (13 storey) buildings in this area will be an eyesore.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55512
Respondent: Laszlo Toth

Neither agree nor disagree

I can't comment. You are making the Science Park a part of it but say nothing about it.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55522
Respondent: Rebecca Arnold-Frost

Agree

No comment.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55532
Respondent: Graham Cater

Strongly disagree

I think update of existing treatment works have been prematurely taken out of the equation. This development if needed at all should be located east of the flyover Horningsea/Fen Ditton with A14.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55542
Respondent: Wendy Iewin-Braben

Strongly disagree

The world has changed with Covid-19. Don't build new concrete blocks or (illegible), use existing city centre shops to (illegible) and redevelop.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55552
Respondent: Kelly Lister

Strongly disagree

WRONG!

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55563
Respondent: Jessica Nudge

Disagree

Adding further housing without improving road infrastructure and public transport availability/frequency for all surrounding areas first, doesn't sound sensible.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55573
Respondent: Mr N R Applin

Strongly disagree

There should not be any further development at all in this area.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55583
Respondent: S Thomas Stuyle

Agree

Seems well connected.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55593
Respondent: Lynne Kindell

Strongly agree

No comment.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55606
Respondent: Historic England

Nothing chosen

Support/Object/Comment: Object Comments: We welcome the regeneration of this area of Cambridge and recognise the exciting opportunity that this brings to develop a modern and distinctive new community for the city. We welcome the aspirations to create a real sense of place and also to firmly integrate the area within the surrounding communities. There is however no mention of the historic environment and the importance of drawing on, reflecting, protecting and enhancing that through new development. Please amend to include reference to that in your vision. Suggested Change: We suggest that you amend the vision to include reference to the historic environment and the importance of drawing on, reflecting, protecting and enhancing that through new development.

No uploaded files for public display