Question 2

Showing forms 1 to 30 of 406
Form ID: 51730
Respondent: Miss Sian Loveday

Mostly yes

The new ped/cycle connections sound good. Only concern is that the gates to enter the Science Park from the busway are locked at evenings and weekends so people from King's Hedges would not be able to make use of the new cycle routes. Being able to cycle from King's Hedges to Milton Tesco via the Science Park would be brilliant. I really hope the gates remain open at all times so that through-routes are not blocked for pedestrians and cyclists - it's a long way round when you discover they are locked! I would love to jog round the science park but every time I go (after work or at the weekend), the gates along the busway are locked.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51742
Respondent: Mr Daniel Ashby

Mostly yes

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51743
Respondent: Mr Tristan Collier

Yes, completely

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51760
Respondent: Mrs Katie L

Neutral

"accessible for everyone" This is a lie. Some people -- as the population ages a large percentage -- cannot cycle or walk far. Public transport is simply hopelessly unreliable. Any people relying on it to get to work know this. Trains have problems more days than they do not, busses are slow and inaccessible. This development will be inaccessible for them. It is, therefore, indirectly discriminatory against disabled people. Prove you can make public transport work for disabled people BEFORE you start claiming that it's sufficient for the only option in a development like this.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51763
Respondent: Encompass Network

Mostly yes

The Chisholm Trail link between North Cambridge and Newmarket Road needs to be completed to make cycling/walking connections viable; I also think that these connections should be reassessed once the Trail has been open for a while to see how it is used and how it might change connections needed most. Also, there need to be clear connections to the Milton Park and Ride as well as simply the general busway.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51765
Respondent: Mrs. Sophie Hyde

Mostly yes

BUT you are ignoring horse riders and carriage drivers - equally vulnerable road users. All paths designated for cyclists should also be suitable for equine use, and routes should seek to link to existing bridleways e.g. Chisholm Trail should be opened up to horses, giving safe off-road hacking routes from Ditton Meadows up to Milton Park and beyond via the tow path to Waterbeath.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51771
Respondent: Milton Road Residents Association

Mostly yes

Lighting for all paths/cycle ways is very important for those moving around at night.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51790
Respondent: Mrs

Mostly yes

Great

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51801
Respondent: Mrs Susan Furzer

Not at all

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51804
Respondent: Mr David Smith

Neutral

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51806
Respondent: Dr Alastair J Reid

Mostly yes

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51820
Respondent: Mark Leaning

Mostly yes

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51834
Respondent: Mr Alex Holland

Yes, completely

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51844
Respondent: Mrs Rachel King

Neutral

It's hard to tell from the plan. As you can't tell what is being built where.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51851
Respondent: Mx Kim Graham

Mostly yes

Just want to make sure it's not just walking and cycling friendly but also wheelchair accessible

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51856
Respondent: Mr Derek Prater

Not at all

Some connections shown within the NEC area but detail totally inadequate regarding the provision of cycling routes outside the NEC area. It is pointless regarding NEC as an isolation development it needs to have a fully integrated strategy for dedicated segregated cycling to both the city and villages.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51864
Respondent: Mr Russell Whiting

Yes, completely

Crossing over milton road is the biggest current hinderance, followed by enterances to the science and business parks. Bridges and underpasses are the key here, as drivers and pedestrians/cyclists

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51867
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Starkie

Mostly yes

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51882
Respondent: Dr David Cottingham

Mostly yes

If the goal is to avoid any additional car use, cycle routes must be of very high quality. At present, cycling routes into the city from North East Cambridge are poor: Neither Milton Road nor Histon Road is suitable for cyclists who are not confident. Expecting high cycle traffic on the river towpath is unrealistic (it is not wide enough, nor does it have a high quality surface). To make people move away from cars, it must be possible to move about without it needing to feel like an off-road expedition (in the case of the river) or a battle with motorists (Milton Road, with its roundabouts). Conclusion: the proposed connections from the site are good, but IMO it is highly unlikely that the goal of moving people away from their cars will be, unless significant investment is made in high-quality cycling infrastructure elsewhere in the city. Put another way, given that Milton is only 5 minutes further away from the city centre by bike, why is it that there is such high car ownership there if the existing cycling infrastructure is deemed good enough for the NE Cambridge site?

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51888
Respondent: None

Mostly yes

We need more peep to travel by train. The present situation whereby people on the business park do not have a direct route to the station is very disappointing, especially for those out the busway side. I support proposals to allow entrances to the Business Park on the busway side.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51905
Respondent: Mr

Mostly not

The walking and cycling connections look reasonable but it probably comes at the expense of the road volume that will enable people to live in the houses

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51909
Respondent: Neil Greenham

Mostly yes

Concerned for connections to those areas slightly further away for those that will work in the area but can't afford to live there. For those that can cycle some of these will be covered if the various Greenways proceed however concerned there is no thoughts on improved vehicle access to businesses, science park and A14. You detail that the area must be future climate proof. How will you ensure cycle routes will stay open in the snow especially if cars are so discouraged.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51919
Respondent: Mr John Benstead

Neutral

Only if the current Anglian Water treatment plant can remain where it is or a suitable other brown field site can be found to relocate it too instead of the 3 green field sites proposed.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51930
Respondent: Mrs Jane Tunnacliffe

Neutral

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51937
Respondent: Ms Kirsty Williams

Neutral

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51954
Respondent: Ms Silvia Ferdin

Yes, completely

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51957
Respondent: Ms Silvia Ferdin

Yes, completely

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51961
Respondent: Pam & Mal Schofield

Yes, completely

Be generous with space & even then it may well not be enough. Address the widening range of cycling options from powered scooter to powered cargo bike,from junior cyclists to the over 80's Segregated walking is essential.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51970
Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell

Mostly yes

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 51977
Respondent: Mr Graham Tregonning

Mostly yes

It seems to have a pretty comprehensive number of connections

No uploaded files for public display