Object
Draft Planning Obligations SPD
Representation ID: 28553
Received: 14/07/2014
Respondent: Carter Jonas
Agent: Carter Jonas
I object to the final sentence of paragraph 3.6.2. A planning obligation in respect of a proposed development should only be sought where the mitigation it delivers is directly related to the proposed development and fairly and reasonably related to it. CIL funds will be pooled and used more broadly than any funds raised from S106 which will be used locally. If a scheme is dropped from the Regulation 123 list, it should not then be expected to be 'picked up' via S106. It must either be CIL or S106 compliant - it cannot be both.
I object to the final sentence of paragraph 3.6.2. A planning obligation in respect of a proposed development should only be sought where the mitigation it delivers is directly related to the proposed development and fairly and reasonably related to it. CIL funds will be pooled and used more broadly than any funds raised from S106 which will be used locally. If a scheme is dropped from the Regulation 123 list, it should not then be expected to be 'picked up' via S106. It must either be CIL or S106 compliant - it cannot be both.