Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29338

Received: 16/12/2014

Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell

Representation Summary:

Even tighter restriction for residential accommodation would be ridiculous (see answer to 38a).
However, there is a need to ensure that parking intended for residents and their visitors isn't usurped by station and business users. Therefore such parking should not be "on-street" but within the confines of each property, in order to avoid having to pay for a "residents' parking scheme".

Full text:

Even tighter restriction for residential accommodation would be ridiculous (see answer to 38a).
However, there is a need to ensure that parking intended for residents and their visitors isn't usurped by station and business users. Therefore such parking should not be "on-street" but within the confines of each property, in order to avoid having to pay for a "residents' parking scheme".