Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 56475
Received: 02/11/2021
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Starkie
Agree with the policy in general, however, the scope is not wide enough. it appears to be restricted to development being required to demonstrate how it provide service or enhances the significance of the heritage at assets of the girl greater Cambridge however it it appears to concentrate on heritage sites in the city without reference to some of the protected conservation areas in villages, e.g those of Fen Ditton, Horningsea, and Baites Bite Lock. see greeted Cambridge green infrastructure opportunity mapping: baseline report; LUC/South Cambridgeshire District Council and Cambridge City Council, November 2020.
figure 6.2, cultural heritage, Page 48 - map shows conservation areas are listed the buildings in circling the proposed site of the CWWTP on greenbelt which appears to negate the policy.
Agree with the policy in general, however, the scope is not wide enough. it appears to be restricted to development being required to demonstrate how it provide service or enhances the significance of the heritage at assets of the girl greater Cambridge however it it appears to concentrate on heritage sites in the city without reference to some of the protected conservation areas in villages, e.g those of Fen Ditton, Horningsea, and Baites Bite Lock. see greeted Cambridge green infrastructure opportunity mapping: baseline report; LUC/South Cambridgeshire District Council and Cambridge City Council, November 2020.
figure 6.2, cultural heritage, Page 48 - map shows conservation areas are listed the buildings in circling the proposed site of the CWWTP on greenbelt which appears to negate the policy.