Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Representation ID: 58143

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Nusrat Hamid

Representation Summary:

S/RSC/HW Land between Hinton Way/Mingle Lane, Great Shelford

I strongly object to the development of green belt land between Mingle Lane and Hinton Way, Great Shelford on the following grounds -
1. 100 homes with cars access through a narrow street without cycle lanes, used by children to commute to primary and secondary schools, that already poses problems for children
2. Meadow with substantial wildlife and bird life being built over
3. No additional schools or nurseries proposed, but 100 more families potentially
4. Water resources stretched
5. More congestion and pollution on busy railway crossing on one end and primary school on the other

Full text:

My representation is with regards to the land proposed to be developed between Hinton Way Great, Shelford and Mingle lane, Stapleford. This land is currently within the Green Belt and has already been considered in the last Local Plan, and then dismissed, as unsuitable for. There are multiple reasons for this prior exclusion including: Adverse impact on the Green Belt changing the linear character of this area of the village, resulting in backland development and encroachment into the transitional area of the fields that provide a softer edge of the village.
There must be "exceptional circumstances" for release of Green Belt land.

No consideration seems to have been given to the impact on the already over crowded local services Schooling and GP. Having 100 more cars on the narrow mingle lane used by primary and secondary school children to cycle to sawston village college and stapleford primary is definitely going to discourage me from getting them cycling to school as will most villagers. This seems to be poorly thought out.

There is also a meadow with substantial wildlife that is being bulldozed to build this. I am concerned that the views of the village residents and parishioners have not been taken into account while allocating this land.

There is a great deal of local opposition to development of the site.
There has been no persuasive new rationale for use of this site, it is against the findings of the consultation, against the principles of the Local plan and does not materially contribute to new housing stock. I would note that the uncertainty and changeability on the part of the council are contributors to significant stress for the local residents.