Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Search representations
Results for Grosvenor Developments search
New searchSupport
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 1
Representation ID: 30122
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
We support the vision but seek a better balance of land uses to effectively allow for the delivery of the vision and objectives set out. This will allow the full extent of the opportunity to be realised for the benefit of Cambridge.
We support the vision but seek a better balance of land uses to effectively allow for the delivery of the vision and objectives set out. This will allow the full extent of the opportunity to be realised for the benefit of Cambridge.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 2
Representation ID: 30123
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Objective 2 - could include a specific reference to residential to provide support for better balance of land uses.
Objective 5 - Reference to mixed use development should be included; zoning approach could work against well designed buildings.
Objective 6 - Stronger connections required to wider area for effective integration. Highly zoned mono use land blocks works against the objective for a well-integrated neighbourhood.
Objective 8 - Requires a mixed community - current imbalance of land uses could increase carbon footprint, encourage unsustainable travel behaviour and add to emissions.
Objective 2 - could include a specific reference to residential to provide support for better balance of land uses.
Objective 5 - Reference to mixed use development should be included; zoning approach could work against well designed buildings.
Objective 6 - Stronger connections required to wider area for effective integration. Highly zoned mono use land blocks works against the objective for a well-integrated neighbourhood.
Objective 8 - Requires a mixed community - current imbalance of land uses could increase carbon footprint, encourage unsustainable travel behaviour and add to emissions.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 3
Representation ID: 30124
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 4
Representation ID: 30125
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 5
Representation ID: 30126
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7a
Representation ID: 30130
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7b
Representation ID: 30131
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7c
Representation ID: 30132
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
This name is suited to giving the area a higher profile.
This name is suited to giving the area a higher profile.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7d
Representation ID: 30133
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 8
Representation ID: 30134
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
The Household Waste Recycling Centre could be relocated in an alternative location to avoid it being a constraint and give greater opportunity to create a place of real character.
We would anticipate further evidence base research being undertaken in order to fully explore and understand other potential constraints including ground conditions.
The Household Waste Recycling Centre could be relocated in an alternative location to avoid it being a constraint and give greater opportunity to create a place of real character.
We would anticipate further evidence base research being undertaken in order to fully explore and understand other potential constraints including ground conditions.
