Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Support

Representation ID: 30468

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Overall, TCE supports the high level options for redevelopment of the site (options 2-4) only if the detailed evidence base work/studies demonstrate that these development options will not cause negative impacts on existing residents, workers and investors. These concerns are set out as follows.


Mix of uses

A mix of uses is proposed for the site including residential uses, a mix of B class/employment uses, new open space, a local centre and the aggregates/railhead sidings use. TCE broadly supports this approach subject to concerns about access and infrastructure, but would like to see inclusion of wording to the effect that the primary function of this area is to be the leading R&D/technology quarter/destination in Cambridge. Any activity to dilute this core/distinctive and valuable focus of the area would be a loss/step backwards,
given its regional/national status. Whilst it is appropriate to have supporting and complementary uses, larger-scale developments should not be permitted.

TCE supports the identification of CBP as offices/R&D with potential for intensification.

Linkages

TCE broadly supports the principle of promoting sustainable transport and movement through the idea of improving permeability and access to key routes, although TCE object to public access and new walkways being provided
through CBP as shown within development options 2-4. For security and health and safety reasons, the general public cannot have access to and through CBP.

However, TCE would like to see improved pedestrian and cycle access between the new railway station and the CBP, for both the occupiers and their customers/visitors. This should be identified and supported in the AAP. Potential options for improving access from CBP to the Station have been previously worked up by Scott Brownrigg and HED and are enclosed for information.

Landscaping

TCE also supports the inclusion of hard and soft landscaping with the AAP area. However, it should be noted that a comprehensive landscaping scheme within CBP has been implemented and this is a matter for TCE. It is worth mentioning that TCE are implementing a Sustainability Action Plan at CBP which includes improving the landscaping/green corridors, promoting biodiversity areas, promoting green travel and other such initiatives. TCE also broadly support the aspiration for a 'green boulevard' along Cowley Road, which would tie in well with the aforementioned initiatives.

Support

Representation ID: 30469

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Overall, TCE supports the high level options for redevelopment of the site (options 2-4) only if the detailed evidence base work/studies demonstrate that these development options will not cause negative impacts on existing residents, workers and investors. These concerns are set out as follows.


Mix of uses

A mix of uses is proposed for the site including residential uses, a mix of B class/employment uses, new open space, a local centre and the aggregates/railhead sidings use. TCE broadly supports this approach subject to concerns about access and infrastructure, but would like to see inclusion of wording to the effect that the primary function of this area is to be the leading R&D/technology quarter/destination in Cambridge. Any activity to dilute this core/distinctive and valuable focus of the area would be a loss/step backwards,
given its regional/national status. Whilst it is appropriate to have supporting and complementary uses, larger-scale developments should not be permitted.

TCE supports the identification of CBP as offices/R&D with potential for intensification.

Linkages

TCE broadly supports the principle of promoting sustainable transport and movement through the idea of improving permeability and access to key routes, although TCE object to public access and new walkways being provided
through CBP as shown within development options 2-4. For security and health and safety reasons, the general public cannot have access to and through CBP.

However, TCE would like to see improved pedestrian and cycle access between the new railway station and the CBP, for both the occupiers and their customers/visitors. This should be identified and supported in the AAP. Potential options for improving access from CBP to the Station have been previously worked up by Scott Brownrigg and HED and are enclosed for information.

Landscaping

TCE also supports the inclusion of hard and soft landscaping with the AAP area. However, it should be noted that a comprehensive landscaping scheme within CBP has been implemented and this is a matter for TCE. It is worth mentioning that TCE are implementing a Sustainability Action Plan at CBP which includes improving the landscaping/green corridors, promoting biodiversity areas, promoting green travel and other such initiatives. TCE also broadly support the aspiration for a 'green boulevard' along Cowley Road, which would tie in well with the aforementioned initiatives.

Comment

Representation ID: 30470

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Overall, TCE supports the high level options for redevelopment of the site (options 2-4) only if the detailed evidence base work/studies demonstrate that these development options will not cause negative impacts on existing residents, workers and investors. These concerns are set out as follows.


Mix of uses

A mix of uses is proposed for the site including residential uses, a mix of B class/employment uses, new open space, a local centre and the aggregates/railhead sidings use. TCE broadly supports this approach subject to concerns about access and infrastructure, but would like to see inclusion of wording to the effect that the primary function of this area is to be the leading R&D/technology quarter/destination in Cambridge. Any activity to dilute this core/distinctive and valuable focus of the area would be a loss/step backwards,
given its regional/national status. Whilst it is appropriate to have supporting and complementary uses, larger-scale developments should not be permitted.

TCE supports the identification of CBP as offices/R&D with potential for intensification.

Linkages

TCE broadly supports the principle of promoting sustainable transport and movement through the idea of improving permeability and access to key routes, although TCE object to public access and new walkways being provided
through CBP as shown within development options 2-4. For security and health and safety reasons, the general public cannot have access to and through CBP.

However, TCE would like to see improved pedestrian and cycle access between the new railway station and the CBP, for both the occupiers and their customers/visitors. This should be identified and supported in the AAP. Potential options for improving access from CBP to the Station have been previously worked up by Scott Brownrigg and HED and are enclosed for information.

Landscaping

TCE also supports the inclusion of hard and soft landscaping with the AAP area. However, it should be noted that a comprehensive landscaping scheme within CBP has been implemented and this is a matter for TCE. It is worth mentioning that TCE are implementing a Sustainability Action Plan at CBP which includes improving the landscaping/green corridors, promoting biodiversity areas, promoting green travel and other such initiatives. TCE also broadly support the aspiration for a 'green boulevard' along Cowley Road, which would tie in well with the aforementioned initiatives.

Support

Representation ID: 30471

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

TCE supports the approach on densities subject to consideration of access and impact on existing uses and the existing townscape.

Support

Representation ID: 30472

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

TCE supports the approach to tall buildings, in accordance with adopted Local Plan policies. TCE further supports the inclusion of additional policies relating to tall buildings in this location. However, this is on the basis that the policy wording is to the effect that the existing building form is taken into consideration.

Comment

Representation ID: 30473

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

TCE supports the approach to tall buildings, in accordance with adopted Local Plan policies. TCE further supports the inclusion of additional policies relating to tall buildings in this location. However, this is on the basis that the policy wording is to the effect that the existing building form is taken into consideration.

Support

Representation ID: 30474

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

Integration with the surrounding area is important to delivering a successful new quarter for Cambridge. However, as set out above, this is subject to an acknowledgement that a number of sites within the AAP area contain commercial premises which cannot be accessible to the general public.

Support

Representation ID: 30475

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

TCE are pleased to see inclusion of specific policies relating to employment uses. TCE support the principle of encouraging R&D and high tech uses and tenants.

Support

Representation ID: 30476

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

TCE support the notion of shared social space which will allow collaboration between the tenants in the AAP area and provides a complementary eating/drinking hub for workers which is not available in this area at present.

Support

Representation ID: 30477

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd

An option is included to include specific policies and potentially article 4 directions to protect office space in this area from conversion to residential use under new permitted development rights. TCE do not support this. There is currently a great deal of demand for employment uses and related business uses1 and further control is not necessary at this stage.