Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Search representations

Results for Marshall Group of Companies search

New search New search

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 18a

Representation ID: 29625

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Marshall Group of Companies

Representation Summary:

Building heights in Option A (heights up to 16m) may be acceptable, but Options B (heights up to 24m) and C (including "significantly taller forms of development") in particular have potential to cause conflicts with safe airport and aircraft operations. In order to ensure that any development principles established through the AAP are deliverable and compatible with the safe operation of the airport, Marshall Group requests that the joint Councils (or any prospective developer) engages early with the Airport to ensure any building heights proposed are compatible with airport operations, including the operation of cranes throughout the development.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 18b

Representation ID: 29626

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Marshall Group of Companies

Representation Summary:

Building heights in Option A (heights up to 16m) may be acceptable, but Options B (heights up to 24m) and C (including "significantly taller forms of development") in particular have potential to cause conflicts with safe airport and aircraft operations. In order to ensure that any development principles established through the AAP are deliverable and compatible with the safe operation of the airport, Marshall Group requests that the joint Councils (or any prospective developer) engages early with the Airport to ensure any building heights proposed are compatible with airport operations, including the operation of cranes throughout the development.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 18c

Representation ID: 29627

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Marshall Group of Companies

Representation Summary:

Building heights in Option A (heights up to 16m) may be acceptable, but Options B (heights up to 24m) and C (including "significantly taller forms of development") in particular have potential to cause conflicts with safe airport and aircraft operations. In order to ensure that any development principles established through the AAP are deliverable and compatible with the safe operation of the airport, Marshall Group requests that the joint Councils (or any prospective developer) engages early with the Airport to ensure any building heights proposed are compatible with airport operations, including the operation of cranes throughout the development.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 18d

Representation ID: 29628

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Marshall Group of Companies

Representation Summary:

These comments are provided on behalf of Marshall Group, which includes Cambridge International Airport. We understand that the area defined as Cambridge Northern Fringe East (CNFE) is located between the A14 to the North, the A10 Milton Road to the West, the Cambridge to Kings Lynn railway line to the east, and residential areas of Chesterton to the south. We also note that the consultation document seeks views on the potential to extend the boundary to include the Cambridge Science Park.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 13

Representation ID: 29629

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Marshall Group of Companies

Representation Summary:

Marshall Group Properties Ltd objects to Redevelopment Option 4 on the basis it assumes relocation of the sewage treatment works.

At the present time is that this is unproven, and until such time as a feasible site has been identified and has a real prospect of delivery, the AAP should not assume further land can be made available for development.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 12

Representation ID: 29630

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Marshall Group of Companies

Representation Summary:

Marshall Group Properties Ltd objects to Redevelopment Option 3 on the basis it assumes that reconfiguration of the Water Recycling Centre onto a smaller site, with more indoor or contracted operations. As noted in the summary of the option this is "subject to technical, financial and operational deliverability." Our view at the present time is that this is unproven.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 8

Representation ID: 30660

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Marshall Group of Companies

Representation Summary:

Cambridge International Airport has lodged formal safeguarding maps with Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. The safeguarding map shows that the area to be covered by the CNFE Area Action Plan falls within the area hatched green on the safeguarding map. Any development proposed with a maximum height in excess of 15 metres above ground level (AGL) requires consultation with the Airport. The site is also within 2.5 nautical miles of the airport and as such falls within the Air Traffic Zone (ATZ) which is controlled by the Air Traffic Controllers at Cambridge International Airport.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.