Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Search representations
Results for Orchard Street Investment Management LLP search
New searchSupport
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 1
Representation ID: 29970
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
The vision is supported, but reference should be made of existing businesses within the area. Their continued success is of prime importance and it will be vital to ensure new development does not impinge on existing developments.
The vision is supported, but reference should be made of existing businesses within the area. Their continued success is of prime importance and it will be vital to ensure new development does not impinge on existing developments.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 2
Representation ID: 29972
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
The objectives are supported, but there is a lack of emphasis on the integration of existing businesses and these should not be adversely affected by the changes. This is vaguely hinted at in Objective 1, but should be further highlighted.
The objectives are supported, but there is a lack of emphasis on the integration of existing businesses and these should not be adversely affected by the changes. This is vaguely hinted at in Objective 1, but should be further highlighted.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 3
Representation ID: 29975
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
The identified area is supported, however see answers to questions 4 and 5 below.
The identified area is supported, however see answers to questions 4 and 5 below.
Question 4 Response: An extension of the Area to include the Science Park is supported as this would provide comprehensive redevelopment principles to both sites, which are adjacent, benefit from the same transport hub, and share similar problems of access.
Question 5 Response:The extension to include Option B is supported to provide additional land to the station area and improve cycle access and permeability in the area generally.
The identified area is supported, however see answers to questions 4 and 5 below.
Question 4 Response: An extension of the Area to include the Science Park is supported as this would provide comprehensive redevelopment principles to both sites, which are adjacent, benefit from the same transport hub, and share similar problems of access.
Question 5 Response:The extension to include Option B is supported to provide additional land to the station area and improve cycle access and permeability in the area generally.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 4
Representation ID: 29977
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
An extension of the Area to include the Science Park is supported as this would provide comprehensive redevelopment principles to both sites, which are adjacent, benefit from the same transport hub, and share similar problems of access.
An extension of the Area to include the Science Park is supported as this would provide comprehensive redevelopment principles to both sites, which are adjacent, benefit from the same transport hub, and share similar problems of access.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 5
Representation ID: 29979
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
The extension to include Option B is supported to provide additional land to the station area and improve cycle access and permeability in the area generally.
The extension to include Option B is supported to provide additional land to the station area and improve cycle access and permeability in the area generally.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 8
Representation ID: 29986
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
No comment on stated issues, but the absence of any information about traffic and junction layout is disappointing as it is impossible to assess the relative impacts of the options on existing developments within the AAP area
No comment on stated issues, but the absence of any information about traffic and junction layout is disappointing as it is impossible to assess the relative impacts of the options on existing developments within the AAP area
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 9
Representation ID: 29989
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
They expand on objectives, but access and traffic must be fully addressed.
They expand on objectives, but access and traffic must be fully addressed.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 10
Representation ID: 29991
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Leaves significant area of underused land with non-conforming use (WWTW) which constrains development. Object to Household Recycling Centre indicative position.
The lack of information about traffic and junction layout does not allow an assessment to be made about the impact on existing businesses.
Leaves significant area of underused land with non-conforming use (WWTW) which constrains development. Object to Household Recycling Centre indicative position.
The lack of information about traffic and junction layout does not allow an assessment to be made about the impact on existing businesses.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 11
Representation ID: 29993
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Leaves significant area of underused land with non-conforming use (WWTW) which constrains development. Object to Household Recycling Centre indicative position.
The lack of information about traffic and junction layout does not allow an assessment to be made about the impact on existing businesses.
Leaves significant area of underused land with non-conforming use (WWTW) which constrains development. Object to Household Recycling Centre indicative position.
The lack of information about traffic and junction layout does not allow an assessment to be made about the impact on existing businesses.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 12
Representation ID: 29995
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Object to indicative location of Household Recycling Centre.
Partially support as reduces area covered by WWTW, but proposes B2/B8 uses adjacent to Vitrum Building / St Johns Innovation site.
The lack of information about traffic and junction layout does not allow an assessment to be made about the impact on existing businesses.
Object to indicative location of Household Recycling Centre.
Partially support as reduces area covered by WWTW, but proposes B2/B8 uses adjacent to Vitrum Building / St Johns Innovation site.
The lack of information about traffic and junction layout does not allow an assessment to be made about the impact on existing businesses.
