Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Search representations

Results for Turnstone Estates Limited search

New search New search

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 45

Representation ID: 30295

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

Turnstone does not consider that there is any need for the AAP to become an overly weighty document, but there would be justification for an Appendix which might list all of the policies in the adopted Local Plan (which is assumed it will be by that date), and to which regard will need to be had when individual applications are made for development within the CNFE area.

Full text:

Turnstone does not consider that there is any need for the AAP to become an overly weighty document, but there would be justification for an Appendix which might list all of the policies in the adopted Local Plan (which is assumed it will be by that date), and to which regard will need to be had when individual applications are made for development within the CNFE area.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 46

Representation ID: 30296

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

Turnstone considers that the Council's general approach to infrastructure is broadly sound, and recognises the possibility of the need for the relocation of the aggregates rail head and the retention of the Water Recycling Centre (WRC), at least in part. Turnstone however believes that, should scope exist, then a relocation of the aggregates rail head away from the CNFE area would be desirable, and should not be ruled out.

Full text:

Turnstone considers that the Council's general approach to infrastructure is broadly sound, and recognises the possibility of the need for the relocation of the aggregates rail head and the retention of the Water Recycling Centre (WRC), at least in part. Turnstone however believes that, should scope exist, then a relocation of the aggregates rail head away from the CNFE area would be desirable, and should not be ruled out.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.