Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
Search representations
Results for EMRAG search
New searchObject
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
1.2.1
Representation ID: 30891
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
Failure to include in aspirations the need to provide public facilities that are presently missing in Romsey and for which this is one of the few sites where they could be provided ( Dr's Surgery, Primary School, Pre-School) or small scale artisan workshops.
Failure to include in aspirations the need to provide public facilities that are presently missing in Romsey and for which this is one of the few sites where they could be provided ( Dr's Surgery, Primary School, Pre-School) or small scale artisan workshops.
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
2.5.9 - School provision
Representation ID: 30892
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
School provision in Romsey is already oversubscribed. Unless the County believes that children should have to walk ( or more likely be driven given the distance) to Primary Schools beyond their immediate neighbourhood this site represents one of the last opportunities to rectify this failing. Waiting for the County Report means the likelihood of utilising this site will have been lost. Contributions towards other distant schools ( Abbey Meadows or St Matthews?) are inadequate and mark a failure of the County to provide neighbourhood schools.
School provision in Romsey is already oversubscribed. Unless the County believes that children should have to walk ( or more likely be driven given the distance) to Primary Schools beyond their immediate neighbourhood this site represents one of the last opportunities to rectify this failing. Waiting for the County Report means the likelihood of utilising this site will have been lost. Contributions towards other distant schools ( Abbey Meadows or St Matthews?) are inadequate and mark a failure of the County to provide neighbourhood schools.
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
2.6.8 - Cycle and pedestrian network
Representation ID: 30893
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
Why isn't the cycle route in Cromwell Road installed recently mentioned?
Why isn't the cycle route in Cromwell Road installed recently mentioned?
Support
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
2.6.9
Representation ID: 30894
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
Agree as long as route goes down Cromwell Rd not Brampton Road
Agree as long as route goes down Cromwell Rd not Brampton Road
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
2.6.10 - Link accross the railway
Representation ID: 30895
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
The 'Scoping' exercise is very limited and relies on the assessment of the county who will never spend money on anything unless they legally have to do so. An independent assessment should be made. Mill Road bridge is patently unsafe except for confident cyclists, and if St Matthews becomes the designated Primary School for the area then a crossing either over or under the railway would be a safe and much needed facility. Space needs to be left to build either a bridge or tunnel ( as at Royston ?) in future.
The 'Scoping' exercise is very limited and relies on the assessment of the county who will never spend money on anything unless they legally have to do so. An independent assessment should be made. Mill Road bridge is patently unsafe except for confident cyclists, and if St Matthews becomes the designated Primary School for the area then a crossing either over or under the railway would be a safe and much needed facility. Space needs to be left to build either a bridge or tunnel ( as at Royston ?) in future.
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
2.6.13
Representation ID: 30896
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
Has the idea of a bridge/tunnel from Cavendish Rd entrance to rail tracks to Council Depot been properly assessed ?
Has the idea of a bridge/tunnel from Cavendish Rd entrance to rail tracks to Council Depot been properly assessed ?
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
2.7.1
Representation ID: 30897
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
This fails to mention:
1. Romsey Rec is already fully used. The recent council consultation recognised this, and the danger of increasing useage destroying the character of the park.
2. Coldhams Common is inaccessible to children due to the dangerous road crossing.
This fails to mention:
1. Romsey Rec is already fully used. The recent council consultation recognised this, and the danger of increasing useage destroying the character of the park.
2. Coldhams Common is inaccessible to children due to the dangerous road crossing.
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
2.7.1
Representation ID: 30898
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
3. The existing open spaces in Cromwell road are failed parks - there is no linkage,and no facilities for ball games etc.
3. The existing open spaces in Cromwell road are failed parks - there is no linkage,and no facilities for ball games etc.
Support
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
4.2.3
Representation ID: 30899
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
support
support
Object
Ridgeons, Cromwell Road: Supplementary Planning Document
4.4.5 - Open space character areas
Representation ID: 30900
Received: 07/03/2016
Respondent: EMRAG
The open space is too narrow - it looks more like a verge than an open space. Where is the area for ball games or play areas that do not disturb neighbours ? Where are the allotments ? The informal wild area is appears to be in an overshaddowed corner over looked by the proposed marque building.
The open space is too narrow - it looks more like a verge than an open space. Where is the area for ball games or play areas that do not disturb neighbours ? Where are the allotments ? The informal wild area is appears to be in an overshaddowed corner over looked by the proposed marque building.