Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

Search representations

Results for Historic England search

New search New search

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

Figure 14: Existing land uses

Representation ID: 31067

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Figure 14 - We would suggest that the orange garages are added to the legend.

Full text:

Figure 14 - We would suggest that the orange garages are added to the legend.

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

Figure 16: Existing building heights

Representation ID: 31068

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Figure 16 Why is the library shown as four storey when, according to paragraph 2.2.20 and also the photograph at figure 6, it should be shown as tall single storey?

Full text:

Figure 16 Why is the library shown as 'four storey' when, according to paragraph 2.2.20 and also the photograph at figure 6, it should be shown as 'tall single storey'?

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

2.2.22 - Heritage assets - Conservation Area

Representation ID: 31069

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 2.2.22 - 29 We welcome the detailed identification of historic assets including the Mill Road Conservation Area, Listed Buildings, and Buildings of Local Interest. However, no mention is made of archaeology/potential archaeology. We would refer you to the County HER for further information in the regard and suggest that an archaeological desk based study and possible site investigation may be required.

Full text:

Paragraphs 2.2.22 - 2.2.29 We welcome the detailed identification of historic assets including the Mill Road Conservation Area, Listed Buildings, and Buildings of Local Interest. However, no mention is made of archaeology/potential archaeology. We would refer you to the County HER for further information in this regard and suggest that an archaeological desk based study and possible site investigation may be required.

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

2.2.31

Representation ID: 31070

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 2.2.31 Please clarify if the 'negative buildings' were identified by the Council (as stated in paragraph 2.2.31) or by the consultant team (as stated in the legend for figure 20 on page 26).

Full text:

Paragraph 2.2.31 Please clarify if the 'negative buildings' were identified by the Council (as stated in paragraph 2.2.31) or by the consultant team (as stated in the legend for figure 20 on page 26).

Support

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

3.2.3 Design

Representation ID: 31071

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 3.2.3 Historic England welcomes the proposed retention of the Listed former Free Library building, the language school and the gatehouse building to the south of the site. The NPPF makes it clear that the Government attaches 'great weight' to the conservation of designated heritage assets (paragraph 132). Any proposals for the site should consider the setting of the listed building and seek and preserve and enhance this. The NPPF confirms that the significance of heritage assets derives not only from a heritage asset's physical presence, but also from its setting (paragraph 132).

Full text:

Paragraph 3.2.3 Historic England welcomes the proposed retention of the Listed former Free Library building, the language school and the gatehouse building to the south of the site. The NPPF makes it clear that the Government attaches 'great weight' to the conservation of designated heritage assets (paragraph 132). Any proposals for the site should consider the setting of the listed building and seek and preserve and enhance this. The NPPF confirms that the significance of heritage assets derives not only from a heritage asset's physical presence, but also from its setting (paragraph 132).

Support

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

4.6.5

Representation ID: 31072

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 4.6.5 We welcome proposals for the refurbishment of existing coach houses in line with our principles of constructive conservation. Opportunities should be sought to re-use existing buildings wherever possible. Historic places are part of our evolving cultural heritage and they reflect the nature and history of the communities that created them. They add distinctiveness, meaning and quality to the places in which we live, providing a sense of continuity and a source of identity. Accommodating change in an appropriate manner will help to secure the future of such assets.

Full text:

Paragraph 4.6.5 We welcome proposals for the refurbishment of existing coach houses in line with our principles of constructive conservation. Opportunities should be sought to re-use existing buildings wherever possible. Historic places are part of our evolving cultural heritage and they reflect the nature and history of the communities that created them. They add distinctiveness, meaning and quality to the places in which we live, providing a sense of continuity and a source of identity. Accommodating change in an appropriate manner will help to secure the future of such assets.

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

4.6.7

Representation ID: 31073

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 4.6.7 In the final sentence, should this read 'Taller buildings' or 'A taller building'? With respect to tall buildings, we refer you to our HE Advice Note 4 - tall buildings: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/tall-buildings-advice-note-4/ . Whilst four storeys may not be regarded as particularly tall, it is taller than the mainly two-storey neighbourhood. Any development would need to give due consideration to the draft Local Plan (Proposed Modifications) which sets out criterion against which tall buildings are assessed. However, we await more detailed proposals to assess and draw firm conclusions in this respect.

Full text:

Paragraph 4.6.7 In the final sentence, should this read 'Taller buildings' or 'A taller building'? With respect to tall buildings, we refer you to our HE Advice Note 4 - tall buildings: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/tall-buildings-advice-note-4/ . Whilst four storeys may not be regarded as particularly tall, it is taller than the mainly two-storey neighbourhood. Any development would need to give due consideration to the draft Local Plan (Proposed Modifications) which sets out criterion against which tall buildings are assessed. However, we await more detailed proposals to assess and draw firm conclusions in this respect.

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

4.6.9 Heritage

Representation ID: 31074

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 4.6.9 Historic England welcomes the requirement for a careful consideration of heritage assets in support of any planning application. Any assessment will need to give consideration to local context and key views. We note that the Council/consultants consider that 4 storeys may be appropriate along the eastern boundary of the site. Any development would need to give due consideration to the draft Local Plan (Proposed Modifications) which sets out criterion against which tall buildings are assessed. Historic England awaits more detailed proposals to assess and draw firm conclusions in this respect.

Full text:

Paragraph 4.6.9 Historic England welcomes the requirement for a careful consideration of heritage assets in support of any planning application. Any assessment will need to give consideration to local context and key views. We note that the Council/consultants consider that 4 storeys may be appropriate along the eastern boundary of the site. Any development would need to give due consideration to the draft Local Plan (Proposed Modifications) which sets out criterion against which tall buildings are assessed. Historic England awaits more detailed proposals to assess and draw firm conclusions in this respect.

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

4.7.2

Representation ID: 31075

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Support - Paragraph 4.7.2 We welcome the approach that streets and blocks should respond to the surrounding context as described in the Conservation Area Appraisal. However, we would suggest an amendment to the wording from 'existing' to 'proposed' for the sentence to make sense. We agree that a dominant north south street pattern, reflecting the surrounding context, would appear to be appropriate in this location.

Full text:

Support - Paragraph 4.7.2 We welcome the approach that streets and blocks should respond to the surrounding context as described in the Conservation Area Appraisal. However, we would suggest an amendment to the wording from 'existing' to 'proposed' for the sentence to make sense. We agree that a dominant north south street pattern, reflecting the surrounding context, would appear to be appropriate in this location.

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

4.7.5 Indictative street typologies

Representation ID: 31076

Received: 19/07/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 4.7.3 and paragraph 4.7.5 We welcome the statement that buildings should be orientated to overlook streets and public spaces with layouts following best practice guidance such as Secure by Design. Has consideration been given to the possibility of routing the Chisholm cycle trail through the main spine of the development as part of the Eagle Foundry Walk in order to ensure that it is adequately overlooked and secure? However, we recognise that this is more a matter for the County Council in their transport planning role.

Full text:

Paragraph 4.7.3 and paragraph 4.7.5 We welcome the statement that buildings should be orientated to overlook streets and public spaces with layouts following best practice guidance such as Secure by Design. Has consideration been given to the possibility of routing the Chisholm cycle trail through the main spine of the development as part of the Eagle Foundry Walk in order to ensure that it is adequately overlooked and secure? However, we recognise that this is more a matter for the County Council in their transport planning role.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.