Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
Search representations
Results for St Andrew's Church search
New searchSupport
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
1.8
Representation ID: 31720
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
There is a need for a more compelling narrative for this new development, and the initial consultations led by Snapdragon have to my mind been disappointing in constructing this.
There is a need for a more compelling narrative for this new development, and the initial consultations led by Snapdragon have to my mind been disappointing in constructing this.
Support
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
2.4
Representation ID: 31721
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
The closure of the airport and loss of jobs would be detrimental to the character of this area and the livelihoods of many. The company is a source of pride to people in the local area, and we support its continued operation on this site. We would not want any development to occur which imagines the eventual filling in with housing of this airfield site.
The closure of the airport and loss of jobs would be detrimental to the character of this area and the livelihoods of many. The company is a source of pride to people in the local area, and we support its continued operation on this site. We would not want any development to occur which imagines the eventual filling in with housing of this airfield site.
Object
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
2.19
Representation ID: 31722
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
We object to green belt land being used for school playing fields unless those fields are opened to the public. There should be benefit to all when greenbelt land is used in this way.
We object to green belt land being used for school playing fields unless those fields are opened to the public. There should be benefit to all when greenbelt land is used in this way.
Object
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
3.5
Representation ID: 31723
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
Point of clarification rather than objection. A bus stop used only once a day in each direction (no 17) should not be considered provision of public transport as it is virtually unusable. We would support an increase to every 10-15 minutes along this route at least during peak times to take the increased population out of their cars.
Point of clarification rather than objection. A bus stop used only once a day in each direction (no 17) should not be considered provision of public transport as it is virtually unusable. We would support an increase to every 10-15 minutes along this route at least during peak times to take the increased population out of their cars.
Object
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
3.15
Representation ID: 31725
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
As the map shows, the convenience and retail stores, pharmacy are not easily walkable from this new development and in order to have a high quality of life in this development planning will need to go into what sort of retail facilities are needed 'on site' to deter people from getting in their cars to access the shops and facilities they need.
As the map shows, the convenience and retail stores, pharmacy are not easily walkable from this new development and in order to have a high quality of life in this development planning will need to go into what sort of retail facilities are needed 'on site' to deter people from getting in their cars to access the shops and facilities they need.
Object
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
3.16
Representation ID: 31726
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
As in the previous question, just pointing out the distance and lack of easily walkable routes to surgeries and other medical facilities for this new development.
As in the previous question, just pointing out the distance and lack of easily walkable routes to surgeries and other medical facilities for this new development.
Object
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
3.17
Representation ID: 31729
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
This map shows that existing bus stops are not close enough to many parts of this new development. In particular there are no bus stops near the site of the proposed new secondary school.
This map shows that existing bus stops are not close enough to many parts of this new development. In particular there are no bus stops near the site of the proposed new secondary school.
Object
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
3.22
Representation ID: 31730
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
Object to the wording 'close proximity'. We do not think that those in the new development will feel in close proximity to any of these save the small bit of roadside land which is Church End green and has little to offer children, or dog walkers as it lies open to a busy road.
Object to the wording 'close proximity'. We do not think that those in the new development will feel in close proximity to any of these save the small bit of roadside land which is Church End green and has little to offer children, or dog walkers as it lies open to a busy road.
Support
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
4.3
Representation ID: 31732
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
We completely support these aims but want closest possible attention paid to how these aspirations will come to pass. What will actually make this a 'vibrant community' rather than a dormitory? and how can the design reflect, but improve upon, the design of the rest of Cherry Hinton, much of which is piecemeal and pedestrian?
We completely support these aims but want closest possible attention paid to how these aspirations will come to pass. What will actually make this a 'vibrant community' rather than a dormitory? and how can the design reflect, but improve upon, the design of the rest of Cherry Hinton, much of which is piecemeal and pedestrian?
Support
Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD
4.5
Representation ID: 31733
Received: 01/10/2017
Respondent: St Andrew's Church
Again, we are looking for imaginative thinking here. At the moment the proposals are not suggesting great connectivity between this development and existing Cherry Hinton. Current residents need a reason to go into the new development, and access by car as well as cycle and foot. THere needs to be parking for visitors to the new community. There needs to be enough parking for the cars generated by the new housing, so that they don't overflow into existing streets forcing permit systems which begin to erode connectivity. Above all Coldham's Lane needs a bike/pedestrian lane.
Again, we are looking for imaginative thinking here. At the moment the proposals are not suggesting great connectivity between this development and existing Cherry Hinton. Current residents need a reason to go into the new development, and access by car as well as cycle and foot. THere needs to be parking for visitors to the new community. There needs to be enough parking for the cars generated by the new housing, so that they don't overflow into existing streets forcing permit systems which begin to erode connectivity. Above all Coldham's Lane needs a bike/pedestrian lane.
