Greater Cambridge Local Plan Issues & Options 2020
Search form responses
Results for CALA Group Ltd search
New searchGypsy and travellers are largely dependant on the urban economy and caravan sites should be located accordingly.
No uploaded files for public display
By meeting current Building Regulations.
No uploaded files for public display
By providing for development of a sufficient scale to support the additional infrastructure required at a viable level or pump prime its provision through government funding (e.g. HIF).
No uploaded files for public display
Focussing growth in locations close to railway stations with frequent services to main towns/cities needs to be the starting point.
No uploaded files for public display
Improving electric infrastructure for electric charging points including upgrading the national grid to meet the additional demand.
No uploaded files for public display
Subject to demonstrating exceptional circumstances land should be considered for Green Belt release. However this should only be after considering all reasonable alternatives including village development in well served locations beyond the Green Belt (e.g. Melbourn).
No uploaded files for public display
Villages need growth to maintain facilities and support social well being.
No uploaded files for public display
The problem with the adopted Local Plan is that it contains unduly restrictive policies based on an poorly conceived hierarchy. It should be made more flexible to meet future housing needs.
No uploaded files for public display
Dispersal: Villages, Public Transport Corridors, Edge of Cambridge: Outside Green Belt, Edge of Cambridge: Green Belt, Densification of existing urban areas, Dispersal: New Settlements
No answer given
No uploaded files for public display
The only option appears to be the airport but this seems unavailable for many years. Whilst it would be sensible to safeguard it for future development sufficient sites elsewhere should also be identified.
No uploaded files for public display
