Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for Horningsea Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

How much development and where?

Representation ID: 58062

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Horningsea Parish Council believes that the local plan as developed in 2018 requires a rework owing to the impact of the global pandemic.

Full text:

Horningsea Parish Council believes that the local plan as developed in 2018 requires a rework owing to the impact of the global pandemic.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

S/NEC: North east Cambridge

Representation ID: 58063

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

There is a glaring omission from the plan. There is no mention of the CWWTPR moving to Green Belt.
The move to Green Belt is proposed as a necessity to unlock a brownfield site on which to build a level of housing/office and retail space that is claimed to be needed (according to dubious figures produced before the global pandemic when working and living patterns were very different than they are now). There is a regulatory requirement that the public and all consultees have sufficient information about any significant effects of the Local Plan in order to make a judgement.

Full text:

There is a glaring omission from the plan. There is no mention of the CWWTPR moving to Green Belt.
The move to Green Belt is proposed as a necessity to unlock a brownfield site on which to build a level of housing/office and retail space that is claimed to be needed (according to dubious figures produced before the global pandemic when working and living patterns were very different than they are now). There is a regulatory requirement that the public and all consultees have sufficient information about any significant effects of the Local Plan in order to make a judgement.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

S/NEC: North east Cambridge

Representation ID: 58064

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

There is a regulatory requirement that the public and all consultees have sufficient information about any significant effects of the Local Plan in order to make a judgement. Omitting the relocation of the CWWTP to Green Belt does not allow for a fully informed judgement.
Anglian Water is required to obtain a Development Consent Order (DCO) to see project through. Horningsea Parish Council believes that Councils are hiding behind the DCO. Horningsea Parish Council believes the public has the right to know why it is being expected to give up Green Belt (high grade agricultural land with important recreational value).

Full text:

There is a regulatory requirement that the public and all consultees have sufficient information about any significant effects of the Local Plan in order to make a judgement. Omitting the relocation of the CWWTP to Green Belt does not allow for a fully informed judgement.
Anglian Water is required to obtain a Development Consent Order (DCO) to see project through. Horningsea Parish Council believes that Councils are hiding behind the DCO. Horningsea Parish Council believes the public has the right to know why it is being expected to give up Green Belt (high grade agricultural land with important recreational value).

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

S/NEC: North east Cambridge

Representation ID: 58065

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

It would be interesting to learn how many dwellings in Cambridge are a) student accommodation and b) vacant investment properties (L Frazer did say she'd find out how many weren't paying Council Tax to try to get an idea of this, don't think we as a Parish Council ever received this info). If either of these figures are significant and/ or increasing I believe the Local Plan should consider ways to restrict both moving forward. If investors and colleges snap up a high % of property within Cambridge then that pushes residents out & drives the need to build more.

Full text:

It would be interesting to learn how many dwellings in Cambridge are a) student accommodation and b) vacant investment properties (L Frazer did say she'd find out how many weren't paying Council Tax to try to get an idea of this, don't think we as a Parish Council ever received this info). If either of these figures are significant and/ or increasing I believe the Local Plan should consider ways to restrict both moving forward. If investors and colleges snap up a high % of property within Cambridge then that pushes residents out & drives the need to build more.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Climate change

Representation ID: 58066

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Horningsea Parish Council believes the proposal to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant - a fully functioning waste water treatment plant - to Green Belt is a waste of taxpayers’ money, a waste of Green Belt and an unnecessary contribution to the effects of climate change.

Full text:

Horningsea Parish Council believes the proposal to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant - a fully functioning waste water treatment plant - to Green Belt is a waste of taxpayers’ money, a waste of Green Belt and an unnecessary contribution to the effects of climate change.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

CC/NZ: Net zero carbon new buildings

Representation ID: 58067

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Carbon expenditure, emissions, and embedded carbon to decommission a fully operational waste water treatment plant and decontaminate site and build new plant within 1 mile of existing inclusive of transfer tunnels, HGV traffic etc., should be factored into carbon cost of fulfilling S/NEC Policy

Full text:

Carbon expenditure, emissions, and embedded carbon to decommission a fully operational waste water treatment plant and decontaminate site and build new plant within 1 mile of existing inclusive of transfer tunnels, HGV traffic etc., should be factored into carbon cost of fulfilling S/NEC Policy

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

CC/CS: Supporting land-based carbon sequestration

Representation ID: 58068

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Decommissioning and building a new Waste Water Treatment Plant on prime agricultural land as a means to fulfil S/NEC Policy is in contrary to CC/CS

Full text:

Decommissioning and building a new Waste Water Treatment Plant on prime agricultural land as a means to fulfil S/NEC Policy is in contrary to CC/CS

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Biodiversity and green spaces

Representation ID: 58069

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

It is very disingenuous and lacking transparency to produce a local plan that does not mention the relocation of the fully functioning Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to Green Belt, in order to unlock a brownfield site for a development project that was imagined for a living/working community prior to the effects of the global pandemic.

Full text:

It is very disingenuous and lacking transparency to produce a local plan that does not mention the relocation of the fully functioning Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to Green Belt, in order to unlock a brownfield site for a development project that was imagined for a living/working community prior to the effects of the global pandemic.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

BG/PO: Protecting open spaces

Representation ID: 58070

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Horningsea Parish Council believes that the proposed relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to Green Belt does nothing to protect open spaces and is a waste of taxpayers’ money.

Full text:

Horningsea Parish Council believes that the proposed relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to Green Belt does nothing to protect open spaces and is a waste of taxpayers’ money.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

BG/EO: Providing and enhancing open spaces

Representation ID: 58071

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Horningsea Parish Council believes that open spaces already exist on the Honey Hill land that is Green Belt. There is no operational need to move the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to Honey Hill. The Horningsea Parish Council believes the public has the right to robustly question whether this relocation is a nationally significant infrastructure project when in fact there is already a fully functioning sewage works already in place.

Full text:

Horningsea Parish Council believes that open spaces already exist on the Honey Hill land that is Green Belt. There is no operational need to move the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to Honey Hill. The Horningsea Parish Council believes the public has the right to robustly question whether this relocation is a nationally significant infrastructure project when in fact there is already a fully functioning sewage works already in place.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.