Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for Horningsea Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

GP/GB: Protection and enhancement of the Cambridge green belt

Representation ID: 58072

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Horningsea Parish Council is flabbergasted that the local plan does not mention the proposed move of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant - a fully functioning waste water treatment plant - to Green Belt. The public has a right to know why it is being expected to give up Green Belt land to relocate a fully functioning wastewater treatment plant.

Full text:

The Horningsea Parish Council is flabbergasted that the local plan does not mention the proposed move of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant - a fully functioning waste water treatment plant - to Green Belt. The public has a right to know why it is being expected to give up Green Belt land to relocate a fully functioning wastewater treatment plant.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Infrastructure

Representation ID: 58074

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Horningsea Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Horningsea Parish Council does not believe that the proposal to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant - a fully functioning wastewater treatment plant - to Green Belt is a good use of £227 million of taxpayers’ money. The infrastructure to treat the sewage is already in place and has capacity until 2050. The proposed relocation (that is a mere 1.5km away) will build a new site that has capacity until 2050. This is a waste of money.

Full text:

Horningsea Parish Council does not believe that the proposal to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant - a fully functioning wastewater treatment plant - to Green Belt is a good use of £227 million of taxpayers’ money. The infrastructure to treat the sewage is already in place and has capacity until 2050. The proposed relocation (that is a mere 1.5km away) will build a new site that has capacity until 2050. This is a waste of money.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.