Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document re-consultation - 2025
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchObject
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document re-consultation - 2025
Chapter 23: Other Potential Development Specific Requirements
Representation ID: 200888
Received: 13/10/2025
Respondent: Historic England
The respondent highlights the need for development to mitigate harm to Cambridge's historic environment amidst rapid growth pressures.
The respondent welcomes the preparation of the SPD for Planning Obligations but considers it a missed opportunity to better reference the historic environment.
A recommendation is made for a more detailed section on the Historic Environment within the SPD, similar to other topic areas.
The respondent suggests including a section detailing when heritage requirements would be sought in the SPD.
See recent SPD for Wandsworth Planning Obligations SPD which includes a helpful historic environment section.
Examples of obligations related to historic buildings and sites are provided, including restoration, public engagement, and conservation management.
The SPD should address Heritage at Risk and clarify how heritage requirements may be identified through Local Plan HIAs or planning applications.
The involvement of Council Conservation and Archaeological Staff in the SPD preparation and assessment is strongly advised to ensure local historic issues are addressed.
Cambridge is a city with a rich historic environment and yet is experiencing sustained pressure for rapid growth which may threaten the very features that make this city so unique and special. It is important that development appropriately mitigates for any harm to the historic environment and the SPD provides an appropriate vehicle and context for this
Historic England therefore welcomes the preparation of an SPD for Planning Obligations. We have previously commented on the first draft of this document in January 2025 (see letter submitted by e-mail on 23rd January 2025). Please refer to our earlier comments – we will not repeat the advice here but our comments still stand.
We appreciate your recent response to our earlier comments. We do consider this a missed opportunity and would recommend that further consideration is given to how the historic environment may be more appropriately referenced in the final version of the SPD as set out to you in our previous response.
We continue to recommend a more detailed section on the Historic Environment in the SPD. Whilst we appreciate that obligations may vary between sites, that is the case for other topic areas such as the natural environment.
We note a recent example of a draft SPD in London currently out for consultation which sets out a clear strategy S106 in relation to the Historic Environment Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document which you may find helpful in considering how to reference this in your SPD.
In particular, we recommend that your SPD should include a section of when heritage requirements would be sought.
The SPD should also set out examples of what sort of obligations might be required including:
• Repairing, restoring or looking after historic buildings and places – including listed buildings, scheduled monuments, historic parks and gardens, and locally listed buildings.
• Putting up heritage information panels or boards to help people understand the history of a place.
• Opening up historic sites to the public more often, such as through open days or special events.
• Improving signs and directions to help people find and learn about historic places.
• Creating, updating and implementing Conservation Management Plans to guide how historic sites are cared for.
• Sharing information about local history with the public – for example, with new residents, schools, or community groups.
• sustainability improvements for historic buildings
• measures for preservation or investigation, recording and recovery of archaeological remains and sites
• display of archaeological sites
Furthermore, the SPD should include a section on addressing Heritage at Risk.
In addition, the SPD should state that heritage requirements may be identified either through Heritage Impact Assessments for the Local Plan (in which case the requirements should be include in Plan policy) or through the Planning application process.
Involvement of Council Conservation and Archaeological Staff
We advise that the conservation and archaeological staff of the Council are involved in the preparation of the SPD and its assessment. They are best placed to advise on local historic environment issues and priorities, as well as identifying opportunities for securing wider benefits for the future conservation and management of heritage assets within the local authority area.