Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Search representations
Results for Grosvenor Developments search
New searchComment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 30e
Representation ID: 30185
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Flexibility is required at this stage
Flexibility is required at this stage
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 31
Representation ID: 30187
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 32
Representation ID: 30188
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
At this stage the approach is too rigid and could need adaptation if more residential is included. Thus location and form needs to be less specific.
At this stage the approach is too rigid and could need adaptation if more residential is included. Thus location and form needs to be less specific.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 33
Representation ID: 30189
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
The standards need to be defined in the context of the proposals and the wider context beyond the AAP area as promoted through enhanced connections to a variety of amenity spaces in the wider area.
The standards need to be defined in the context of the proposals and the wider context beyond the AAP area as promoted through enhanced connections to a variety of amenity spaces in the wider area.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 34
Representation ID: 30191
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 35a
Representation ID: 30192
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 35b
Representation ID: 30194
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Subject to viability; recognise the need to minimise car journeys and exploit the enhanced transport infrastructure.
Subject to viability; recognise the need to minimise car journeys and exploit the enhanced transport infrastructure.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 36d
Representation ID: 30195
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Insufficient detail to comment at this stage.
Insufficient detail to comment at this stage.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 37a
Representation ID: 30196
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 37b
Representation ID: 30198
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
