Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Search representations

Results for Cambridgeshire County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 44

Representation ID: 29949

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 45

Representation ID: 29950

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 46

Representation ID: 29951

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Recommend addition of 'waste infrastructure' for consistency with the approach set out within the RECAP Waste Management Design Guide SPD(2012) which highlights the importance of designing in waste infrastructure at the outset to support a sustainable community.
Involve all elements of waste infrastructure and storage requirements for housing and businesses, right up to the Household Recycling Centre provision.

Although Para 10.5 states that infrastructure provision will be funded through a number of sources, we are still concerned that the viability of some of the options is still unclear, which questions the delivery of some of the proposals. Further clarification needed.

Full text:

We would recommend that 'waste infrastructure' is added to this section. The inclusion of waste would be consistent with the approach set out within the RECAP Waste Management Design Guide SPD (2012) which highlights the importance of designing in waste infrastructure at the outset to support a sustainable community. This would involve all elements of waste infrastructure and storage requirements for housing and businesses, right up to the Household Recycling Centre provision.

Furthermore, although Para 10.5 states that infrastructure provision will be funded through a number of sources, we are still concerned that the viability of some of the options is still unclear, which questions the delivery of some of the proposals. This needs to be clarified going forward.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 47a

Representation ID: 29952

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Option A is realistic as it accepts that development will come forward in the different areas of the CNFE at different times. This is particularly the case if Options 3 or 4 were pursued, both of which foresee major changes to the Water Recycling Centre. These options are dependent upon a viable financial arrangement being in place, and may take a considerable time to deliver.

Full text:

Option A is realistic as it accepts that development will come forward in the different areas of the CNFE at different times. This is particularly the case if Options 3 or 4 were pursued, both of which foresee major changes to the Water Recycling Centre. These options are dependent upon a viable financial arrangement being in place, and may take a considerable time to deliver.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 47b

Representation ID: 29953

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Option B may be difficult to deliver given that a developer of the early phases may not be aware of issues and constraints in areas they do not propose to develop, and therefore it may not be appropriate to propose detailed master planning proposals for other areas of the CNFE. In particular the reduction in size and enclosure of the Water Recycling Centre in Option 3 could take different forms and be located in different ways on the site depending on the constraints placed on the redevelopment by the inlet works and other technical aspects of the development.

Full text:

Option B may be difficult to deliver given that a developer of the early phases may not be aware of issues and constraints in areas they do not propose to develop, and therefore it may not be appropriate to propose detailed master planning proposals for other areas of the CNFE. In particular the reduction in size and enclosure of the Water Recycling Centre in Option 3 could take different forms and be located in different ways on the site depending on the constraints placed on the redevelopment by the inlet works and other technical aspects of the development.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 48

Representation ID: 29954

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 49

Representation ID: 29955

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Viability calculations will need to factor in the very real transport challenges as well as those associated with redesigned/relocated water recycling works.

Full text:

Viability calculations will need to factor in the very real transport challenges as well as those associated with redesigned/relocated water recycling works.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 7e

Representation ID: 29963

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

None.

Full text:

None.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 24b

Representation ID: 30630

Received: 27/03/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.