Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Search representations
Results for Milton Parish Council search
New searchComment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 1
Representation ID: 30377
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Whilst developing the brownfield site, the masterplan should safeguard a route for a road across into Fen Road Chesterton either via a new level crossing or a bridge over the railway, to link across at an appropriate point in the road system on the other side, avoiding residential areas already developed by Travellers there. Whilst there is currently no plan to fund such a route, this will be needed later. The aim to accommodate a new Household Waste Recycling Centre here is misguided and the current site at Butt Lane is much more suitable.
See attached document
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 2
Representation ID: 30378
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Objective 6:
Links across the railway to Fen Road, and the foot/cycle bridge across the River Cam to link to Abbey are very important. Special attention should be given to a direct route for cyclists from Abbey to the station.
See attached document
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 3
Representation ID: 30379
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
St Johns Innovation Centre and the other business premises on that 'teardrop' site and Cambridge Business Park do not need redevelopment or intensification. They should be left out of the AAP or have policies applied that recognise this.
See attached document
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 4
Representation ID: 30380
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
We would like to see more control over intensification of uses on the Cambridge Science Park, with mature trees retained, and the consequences for traffic on Milton Road considered alongside the intensification around the new station. Perhaps the Science Park is a more suitable area for some residential development now?
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7a
Representation ID: 30382
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Object - The station is not at the Science Park.
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7b
Representation ID: 30383
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Object
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7c
Representation ID: 30384
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Support - Cambridge North Station identifies the station as being in Cambridge and geographically to the north.
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 7d
Representation ID: 30385
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Object - the station will not be in the Fen.
See attached document
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 8
Representation ID: 30386
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
In 6.10 you say "there are no recorded instances of groundwater flooding within CNFE". Milton Parish Council was always concerned with the high water table South of the A14, and flooding on Chesterton Sidings and Fen Road Chesterton area. The very important First Public Drain provides for the whole of NE Cambridge (from Huntingdon Road eastwards), and Orchard Park, not just "the surrounding area".
Please consider safeguarding the old surface water drain under the sidings (and existing railway) straight through to Camside Farm, which could be a cheaper route for a sewage connection under the railway to Fen Road residences.
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 10
Representation ID: 30387
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Object
We would like to see the Waste Water Treatment Centre moved away or significantly modernised to stop any odour-nuisance to neighbours. The aggregates area in this option effectively blocks any possible level crossing to Fen Road. No residential development, underexploits the potential for improvement. Not enough green space - even office developments need "lungs".
See attached document