Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Search representations

Results for CODE Development Planners Ltd search

New search New search

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 21

Representation ID: 29770

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Shared social spaces contribute to open innovation. It is highly questionable if an atmosphere of social interaction and open innovation could be fostered at a site which is heavily constrained through noise, odour, insects, vibration and HGV traffic.
Open Innovation has become the 'best practice' approach to product and service development for R&D intensive businesses over the last ten years.
Not the only but the most recent and perhaps most notable example of the approach as it applies to Cambridge has emerged since the Draft Local Plans' evidence base was prepared.

Full text:

Shared social spaces contribute to open innovation. It is highly questionable if an atmosphere of social interaction and open innovation could be fostered at a site which is heavily constrained through noise, odour, insects, vibration and HGV traffic.
Open Innovation has become the 'best practice' approach to product and service development for R&D intensive businesses over the last ten years and Cambridge has become a global magnet for this activity, because of the opportunity to work alongside such outstanding research and R&D activity.
Not the only but the most recent and perhaps most notable example of the approach as it applies to Cambridge has emerged since the Draft Local Plans' evidence base was prepared. Astra Zeneca's announcement of a relocation of its HQ (2,000 employees) to the Cambridge Bio-medical Campus reinforces the substantial impact the 'open innovation' approach is having on Cambridge's R&D sector. The immediate further interest and commitment from other companies and organisations preparing to develop new operations on the immediately adjacent land at CBC and the allocated CBC Phase 2 is testament to the impact of the approach.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 22a

Representation ID: 29771

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

No Comment.

Full text:

No Comment.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 22b

Representation ID: 29772

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 22c

Representation ID: 29773

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

No.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 23a

Representation ID: 29774

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Cambridge Science Park does not require to be included in the AAP; it has adequate policy direction and protection through the Draft Local Plans.
To include the Cambridge Science Park within the boundary of the AAP risks that the AAP area will be seen as a success delivering increased employment floorspace by virtue of the science park's altering state; development which would happen regardless of the AAP being in place or not.

Full text:

Cambridge Science Park does not require to be included in the AAP; it has adequate policy direction and protection through the Draft Local Plans. Any further material planning considerations which may be associated with this document may lead to delays in decision making as it is unclear how long it will take for this plan to be adopted. These potential delays and proliferation of planning guidance is in direct contrast to Central Government initiatives to reduce planning bureaucracy and the presumption that policy compliant development should be approved without delay, as directed by the NPPF.
To include the Cambridge Science Park within the boundary of the AAP risks that the AAP area will be seen as a success delivering increased employment floorspace by virtue of the science park's altering state; development which would happen regardless of the AAP being in place or not. The success of the AAP site will have a direct bearing on the ability of Cambridge to attract global R&D investment, if it is not delivering employment floorspace and affordable dwellings quickly this needs to be identifiable quickly and resolved through a review. To include the Cambridge Science Park in the boundary risks masking this important monitoring factor.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 23b

Representation ID: 29775

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

The intensification/densification of sites within the Cambridge Science Park should be judged against existing and emerging Local Plan policies and other material such as NPPF. The intensification of uses within the science park is a current and ongoing dynamic and the need to provide guidance is now. To delay providing guidance by placing it within this AAP would be too late. The Council should seek to address these issues through the Draft Local Plan which could be complemented by Supplementary Planning Guidance which could be relatively quick to produce, if it is considered necessary at all.

Full text:

The intensification/densification of sites within the Cambridge Science Park should be judged against existing and emerging Local Plan policies and other material such as NPPF. The intensification of uses within the science park is a current and ongoing dynamic and the need to provide guidance is now. To delay providing guidance by placing it within this AAP would be too late. The Council should seek to address these issues through the Draft Local Plan which could be complemented by Supplementary Planning Guidance which could be relatively quick to produce, if it is considered necessary at all.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 23c

Representation ID: 29776

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

No.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 24a

Representation ID: 29777

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved

Full text:

Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 24b

Representation ID: 29778

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

Full text:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 24c

Representation ID: 29779

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

Full text:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.