North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Search representations
Results for Trinity College search
New searchComment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 68: Should the AAP require developments in the area to integrate SMART technologies from the outset?
Representation ID: 33836
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
As a place to be founded on the Science and Technology section there should be an ambition to embrace Smart Technologies
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 69: Should the AAP require the use of an underground waste system where is viable?
Representation ID: 33837
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
This would be difficult to retrospectively fit to Cambridge Science Park, but would be more viable for new large scale development.
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 70: Do you agree that the AAP should prioritise land that can feasibly be developed early? Are there any risks associated with this proposed approach?
Representation ID: 33838
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
Trinity College Cambridge support early-development to ensure momentum in the North East area is maintained, which will support the long-term delivery of the whole AAP area and continue to provide confidence in its delivery. Early delivery of infrastructure is also supported. .
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 72: Do you agree with an approach of devising a Section 106 regime specifically for the North East Cambridge area? If not, what alternative approach should we consider?
Representation ID: 33839
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
Trinity College Cambridge is agreeable to this being explored. It will, of course, be subject to the detail, but the principle is acceptable.
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 73: What approach do you consider the most appropriate basis on which to apportion the cost of the infrastructure requirements arising from different land uses to ensure an equitable outcome?
Representation ID: 33840
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
At the outset, it would appear appropriate for it to be related to the amount of new floorspace provided against its Use Class.
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 74: How should the AAP take into account potential changes over time, both positive and negative, that might affect development viability?
Representation ID: 33841
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
A repeating point that the AAP needs a flexible policy framework and not be overly prescriptive so as to allow for flexibility to encourage delivery and innovate developments.
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 75: Do you agree with the proposal to require land assembly where it can be demonstrated that this is necessary for delivering the agreed masterplan for the North East Cambridge area and/or t
Representation ID: 33842
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
Trinity College Cambridge can only make comment in reference to CSP, but this would not be supported because all matters should be achieved through discussion given there is strong shared ambition.
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 76: Should the AAP state that the Councils will consider use of their Compulsory Purchase powers? If so, should the AAP also set out the circumstances under which this would appropriate?
Representation ID: 33843
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
Trinity College Cambridge can only make comment in reference to Cambridge Science Park, but this would not be supported because all matters should be achieved through discussion given there is strong shared ambition.
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 77: Should the Councils actively seek to facilitate joint working between the various landowners/developers within the North East Cambridge area? If so, what specific matters could we target
Representation ID: 33844
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
Yes, the shared ambitions will be more likely to be achieved through joint working focussed around connectivity, sustainable transport infrastructure and public transport.
Please see attached representation
Comment
North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019
Question 78: Do you agree with the Councils' proposed approach to dealing with planning applications made ahead of the AAP reaching a more formal stage of preparation?
Representation ID: 33845
Received: 25/03/2019
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
The recently adopted Local Plan made it clear that planning applications are capable of being granted planning permission in advance of the AAP being adopted, the AAP needs to adhere to this overarching policy position. It is important to keep momentum in the North East area to retain and build on the important contribution it makes to the local economy and to keep confidence in the significant investment required to deliver the full AAP aspirations.
Please see attached representation
